Answer:
The act of the U.S.A in going to war with Mexico proved advantageous in terms of allowing the nation to continue its territorial expansion as it was envisioned by President Polk. It also proved the strength of the U.S. in terms of "patriotism."
On the contrary, the act of the U.S.A. in going to war with Mexico cost the country a lot of money and loss of many lives. It also <u>worsened the issue about </u><u>"slavery." </u>
Explanation:
The "Mexican-American War" occurred from<em> 1846 to 1848.</em> The war started because of the annexation of Texas.
The U.S. believed that annexing Texas would allow them to <em>expand their territories,</em> however, the<em> Mexican government</em> did not recognize such event. They even p<em>revented diplomatic relationship </em>with the Americans when the Americans attempted to settle the issue with them.
With the promulgation of its constitution in 2015, Nepal replaced a unitary government with a federal system of government. This process has made Nepal a federal democratic republic governed with three levels of government: a federal level, seven provinces and 753 local government.
Because it simulates a word-of-mouth recommendation. In addition, a word of mouth promotion is important for every business as each contented customer can ox dozens of new ones your way. The word of mouth is the transient of information from an individual to individual by the oral message which could be as simple as influence somebody the period of a day.
If I got caught red-handed
in burglary, first of all I would expect is to be arrested then taken to the
jail where they would take my fingerprint and photograph.
<span>I would then expect to be brought before a judge in a court. And then
there I would be told according to all the evidences I am guilty, about the
charges, rights and bail. May be I would be fined or sentenced for some years of
life in a prison.</span>
Answer:
The passage commits a fallacy and specifically commits a false cause fallacy
Explanation:
A fallacy is a sort of faulty reasoning that makes a faulty argument. A fallacy usually denoted an error in logical form of an argument, it could also be formal or informal.
A fallacy of false cause is a kind of fallacy that makes a wrong conclusion from a premise that is usually arbitrary or imaginary. Example, how can the speaker above be so sure that the individual going to Las Vegas would end up exactly the way he had said it.
