Answer:
$71.80
Explanation:
First, calculate the present value (PV) of each year's dividend at 11% required return;
PV(of D1) = 1.65 / (1.11) = 1.4865
PV(of D2) = 1.97 / (1.11²) = 1.5969
PV(of D3) = 2.54 / (1.11³) = 1.8572
Find D4 = 2.54(1+0.08) = 2.7432
Next find Present value PV of terminal cashflows
PV(of D4 onwards) = 
Add the PVs to find the current value of the stock today;
= 1.4865 + 1.5969 + 1.8572 + 66.8601
= 71.8007
Therefore, it is worth $71.80
Answer: AGREE
Explanation:
A Monopoly faces no competition and are the only sellers of the product they sell. If firms in an industry successfully engage in collusion, the resultant effect will definitely be not unlike a Monopoly because they will set prices as a single firm, control output as a single firm and essentially run the market as a single firm.
They will sell at a rate where the Marginal Revenue curve will be below the demand curve. This will mean a higher price than a competitive market which was probably the main incentive for collusion.
A recent example would be the collusion between BMW, Daimler and Volkswagen, to hinder technological progress in improving the quality of vehicle emissions in order to reduce the cost of production and maximize profits. Thankfully this was busted by the European Commission in 2019.
Answer:
$21,000
Explanation:
Economic profit = accounting profit - implicit cost
Accounting profit= total revenue - explicit cost
Explicit cost includes the amount expended in running the business. They include rent , salary and cost of raw materials
Implicit cost is the cost of the next best option forgone when one alternative is chosen over other alternatives. Implicit cost includes salary lost due to opening the shop and interest that could have been earned on the savings
Total explicit cost = $80,000 + $40,000 + $15,000 = $135,000
Accounting profit = $200,000 - $135,000 = $65,000
Economic profit = $65,000 - ($40,000 + $4,000) = $21,000
b. buy enough of the two goods such that the marginal utility from the last dinner consumed is four times greater than the marginal utility from the last video.
This is because they are paying 4 times as much for the dinner so should get 4 times the utility from it.
Answer:
The graph following these guidelines:
A graph titled Percentage changes in investment rate and G D P has year on the x-axis, from 2008 to 2012, and percentage changed on the y-axis from negative 20 to positive 10 percent, in increments of 5. Both the lines representing investment rate and G D P follow the same trend.
Demonstrates thatchanges in investment
can show if the economy is growing or shrinking.
Explanation:
This graph is a very illustrative one that marks the increment of both the investment rate and the GDP. Establishing a correlation between them means that one is dependant from the other and that the movement in one can create a specific movement in the other. Generally, investment boosts GDP. Now we can use this to deduct growth or decrease in the economy.
