1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
STatiana [176]
3 years ago
16

How was a successor to Muhammad chosen?

History
2 answers:
Artemon [7]3 years ago
7 0
First: a successor for Muhammad had to be chosen, because none of his sons survived to adulthood, so a hereditary succession was not in question.

A successor to Muhammad (or generally a religious and political leader) is called caliph. The first caliph was chosen by recommendation from many of Muhammad comrades, most notably by Umar (who was a caliph later), and it was Abu Bakr.

The choice was disputed and some believed it should be Ali should be the rightful successor.

In general, the successor was chosen by recommendation from others and choice among the leading figures.
DedPeter [7]3 years ago
4 0
<h2>C. Muhammad’s successor was elected by the clans. </h2>
You might be interested in
( Choose all that apply )
matrenka [14]
City planners do all of the above mentioned statements. Urban planners<span> develop plans and programs for the use of land for towns, </span>cities<span>, counties and regions, while taking into account environmental, zoning and legal issues. They often present reports to government officials and the public about land-use projects. They also know how to build cities from scratch.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
At its start, what was the primary goal of Al-Qaeda?
Rasek [7]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
explique como o processo dos cercamentos de terrar na inglaterra influenciou o processo revolucionário inglês durante o século X
Tanya [424]

TRANSLATED ANSWER :explain how the process of the earthen enclosures in England influenced the English revolutionary process during the seventeenth century : ANSWER :  Enclosure (sometimes inclosure) was the legal process in England of consolidating (enclosing) small landholdings into larger farms.[1] Once enclosed, use of the land became restricted to the owner, and it ceased to be common land for communal use. In England and Wales the term is also used for the process that ended the ancient system of arable farming in open fields. Under enclosure, such land is fenced (enclosed) and deeded or entitled to one or more owners. The process of enclosure began to be a widespread feature of the English agricultural landscape during the 16th century. By the 19th century, unenclosed commons had become largely restricted to rough pasture in mountainous areas and to relatively small parts of the lowlands.

Enclosure could be accomplished by buying the ground rights and all common rights to accomplish exclusive rights of use, which increased the value of the land. The other method was by passing laws causing or forcing enclosure, such as Parliamentary enclosure involving an Inclosure Act. The latter process of enclosure was sometimes accompanied by force, resistance, and bloodshed, and remains among the most controversial areas of agricultural and economic history in England. Marxist and neo-Marxist historians argue that rich landowners used their control of state processes to appropriate public land for their private benefit.[2][better source needed] During the Georgian era, the process of enclosure created a landless working class that provided the labour required in the new industries developing in the north of England. For example: "In agriculture the years between 1760 and 1820 are the years of wholesale enclosure in which, in village after village, common rights are lost".[3] E. P. Thompson argues that "Enclosure (when all the sophistications are allowed for) was a plain enough case of class robbery."[4][5]

W. A. Armstrong, among others, argued that this is perhaps an oversimplification, that the better-off members of the European peasantry encouraged and participated actively in enclosure, seeking to end the perpetual poverty of subsistence farming. "We should be careful not to ascribe to [enclosure] developments that were the consequence of a much broader and more complex process of historical change."[6] "The impact of eighteenth and nineteenth century enclosure has been grossly exaggerated ..."[7][8]

Enclosure is considered one of the causes of the British Agricultural Revolution. Enclosed land was under control of the farmer who was free to adopt better farming practices. There was widespread agreement in contemporary accounts that profit making opportunities were better with enclosed land.[9] Following enclosure, crop yields increased while at the same time labour productivity increased enough to create a surplus of labour. The increased labour supply is considered one of the causes of the Industrial Revolution.[10] Marx argued in Capital that enclosure played a constitutive role in the revolutionary transformation of feudalism into capitalism, both by transforming land from a means of subsistence into a means to realize profit on commodity markets (primarily wool in the English case), and by creating the conditions for the modern labour market by transforming small peasant proprietors and serfs into agricultural wage-labourers, whose opportunities to exit the market declined as the common lands were enclosed.

7 0
3 years ago
In what ways did the United States change after the end of the Spanish American war
Makovka662 [10]

Answer:

Base on the question is asking to choose among the following choices that states the four ways that the United States did change after the end of the Spanish-American War and base on my further research, I would say that first, The added possessions meant new responsibilities for the United States, Second, the US navy increased size, Third, the US involvement in international affairs increased and lastly Agriculture increased in the United States following e war. 

Read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/341905#readmore

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the case Plessy vs. Ferguson, the Supreme Court ruled that "separate but equal" was constitutional.
Alexandra [31]
True. it was ruled that blacks and whites could be expected to go to separate places as long as they were equal<span />
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were the justifications for American Imperialism?
    10·1 answer
  • Which geographical formation separates the Americas ? Separates Asia from Africa?
    6·1 answer
  • During the Antebellum period, what group was at the top of the South's social hierarchy?
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following best describes the United States?
    7·2 answers
  • What were the most important changes that happened in American families due to the Market Revolution? You can choose up to five
    8·1 answer
  • In the late 1800s, sharecroppers paid their rent with
    14·2 answers
  • When was the beginning of WW2 and where did it take place?
    11·2 answers
  • Act is another word for?
    5·1 answer
  • 12. What did the House of Burgesses mark the beginning of ?
    12·1 answer
  • The hebrews were unlike other cultures at the time because they
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!