Answer:
28.63%
Explanation:
The computation of the cost of preferred stock is shown below:
Cost of the preferred stock = Dividend ÷ Price of the stock
where,
Dividend is
= $1,000 × $15%
= $150
And, the price of the stock is
= Market value of the stock - flotation cost
= $576 - $52
= $524
So, the cost of preferred stock is
= $150 ÷ $524
= 28.63%
We ignored the marginal tax rate i.e 40%
Answer:
Misstatement of age
Explanation:
If the insurance company knows that a person has intentionally lied about his/her age, they will adjust the insurance amount and premium to match the correct age of the insured. E.g. in this case, Lisa will probably be required to pay a higher premium on her policy, and depending on her age, the insurance amount might be lower.
Answer:
number of periods = 8 years.
Explanation:
We know,
Future Value = Present value × 
Here,
Present value = PV = $2,500
Future value = FV = $3,500
Interest rate (Compounding) = 5% = 0.05
We have to determine how many years (Periods) it will take, n = ?
Putting the values into the above formula,
$3,500 = $2,500 × 
or, = $3,500 ÷ $2,500
or, n log 1.05 = 1.4
or, n × 0.17609 = 1.4
or, n = 1.4 ÷ 0.17609
Therefore, number of years = 7.95 or 8 years.
Answer:
Explanation:
The journal entries are shown below:
a. Artwork A/c Dr $85,500
To Cash A/c $85,500
(Being work is reported on the government-wide financial statements)
Depreciation Expense A/c Dr $5,700
To Accumulated Depreciation A/c $5,700
(Being depreciation expense is recorded)
The depreciation expense is shown below:
= Original cost ÷ useful life
= $85,500 ÷ 15 years
= $5,700
b. Artwork expenditure A/c Dr $85,500
To Cash A/c $85,500
(Being work is reported on the fund financial statements
Answer:
Nominal group technique which is sometimes denoted as NGT is type of decision making approach that first step include identification of problems and then resolve them.
Explanation:
Nominal group technique which is sometimes denoted as NGT is type of decision making approach that first step include identification of problems and then resolve them.
This type of approach want every single member involvement and their ideas to be share among the present group. The main advantage of this approach is that it include every individual participation, chaos or noise between the discussion is less.
