All categories

3 years ago

Using an amount of force that is beyond that which is reasonably necessary.

Law

2 answers:

12345 [234]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

“Use of Force” law has applications in both in civil and criminal contexts. Established principles give civilians the right to apply force to the person of another and to engage in violence for the sole purpose of defending one’s own life or the life of a third party from physical harm, great bodily injury, and/or even death.

What Is Force?

Force is any verbal or physical action taken to control, restrain, or stop another. If you make physical contact with another person in order to stop, disable, injure, or inflict great bodily injury, or even to kill them, your actions will be reviewed to determine if you acted as a “reasonable person” (see below for definition). In the context of this book, we address force used to keep you free from physical and emotional harm, serious bodily injury, or death. Generally, a person may lawfully react in self-defense, but only if she uses an amount of force that is reasonable to maintain her safety.

lora16 [44]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The amount of force necessary to protect oneself or one's property. A person is generally justified in using force that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm if the person reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.

Explanation:

Use of force. Hope this helps!

You might be interested in

QUESTION 4

kiruha [24]

Answer:

Under Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, Congress has the power "to make all Laws which shallbe necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by thisConstitution in the Government of theUnited States, or any Department or Officer thereof".

3 0

3 years ago

The people of one country have decided they no longer wish to have individual state governments. They all basically have the sam

IgorLugansk [536]

Unitary because the people all don’t want to be controlled by the government

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What are the rights guaranteed by the bill of rights that cannot be taken away by

Mars2501 [29]

Answer:

First Amendment: Freedom of religion, freedom of speech and the press, the right to assemble, the right to petition government.

Explanation:

3 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How many members are needed to override a presidential veto?

kupik [55]

Answer:

290 members.

Explanation:

Override a presidential veto is the process to pass a bill over the president's objection. To be able to do it, it is necessary to have a two thirds vote in each Chamber. The are 435 members, which means that it will be required to have 290 members to pass the bill.

8 0

3 years ago

Difference between voluntary and involuntary manslaughter

alekssr [168]

Involuntary Manslaughter:

There is an important difference between voluntary manslaughter and involuntary manslaughter. The term involuntary manslaughter is used to refer to the unintentional killing of a person. It might result from criminal negligence, recklessness, or misdemeanor.

The person who commits involuntary manslaughter does not want the victim to die. For example, a person who drives under the influence of alcohol may hit and kill a pedestrian, although killing him was not his intention.

Elements that constitute the offense :

A person can be charged with involuntary manslaughter if the following three criteria are met.

The defendant committed an act that resulted in the death of a person.

The defendant knew that his conduct might endanger lives.

The act was inherently dangerous or was done with a total lack of concern for human life.

Voluntary Manslaughter:

The term voluntary manslaughter is used to refer to intentional killing. However, in involuntary killing, the person who commits the crime has no prior intention to kill. The murder happens in the ‘heat of passion’. The situations which lead to the crime are of the kind which would cause a person of rational judgment to become mentally or emotionally disturbed. In the absence of such causes, the killing could be regarded as first or second degree murder. Among the various kinds of homicides, this crime falls between murder, which is a crime committed with malice aforethought, and the excusable and justified taking of life committed in self-defense. The latter doesn’t constitute a crime.

Voluntary manslaughter is different than involuntary manslaughter and its definition depends upon the state in which the crime occurs. On the other hand, involuntary manslaughter occurs when a person dies due to the recklessness or irresponsibility of the defendant.

Heat of Passion:

According to Federal law, voluntary manslaughter is the illegal killing of a person without malicious intent. It happens in the ‘heat of passion’. This term is used to refer to an uncontrollable emotion that any reasonable person may experience under similar circumstances. In the case of first degree murder, the idea of malicious intent or premeditation is present, but it is absent in the case of voluntary manslaughter. The presence of one negates the other.

Voluntary manslaughter is sometimes also defined as an act of killing that is committed with the wrong notion that the killing is justified. For example, a person who kills another in self-defense may be charged with voluntary manslaughter if he was the original attacker in the situation.

6 0

3 years ago