I'll help you don't worry. Don't stress out. Ok now English is easy especially when it comes to literature all you have to do is focus and try new things. Also open your mind and try to absorb things in instead of getting blocked in certain projects or subjects you don't understand. I suggest you honestly read my post to understand this subject better though to be honest I'm no teacher just a regular student.
Let's start.. Irony. What is Irony and how do you identify it? Well Irony in literature is just <span>playing around with words such that the meaning implied by a sentence or word is actually different from the literal meaning. Seem easy? Now how do you identify it? That's easy too. You just have to keep 3 things in mind there is verbal irony, dramatic irony and situational irony.
Watch these vids it's in utube:
Situational: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqg6RO8c_W0
Verbal: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IiR-bnCHIYo
Dramatic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZFYuX84n1U
This will explain things better. Now, you saw it? Good. Now based on all this knowledge you have earned can you identify what type of irony is in</span><span> the Missionary Society's meeting for the betterment of conditions for those poor Mrunas?
Don't worry if you still don't understand the subject you can ask me. Just not now since I'm a bit busy. I honestly hope that this helped. </span>
Answer:
This case involves a federal death sentence imposed on defendant-appellant Fields for conviction of a federal capital offense. Fields was sentenced to death largely on the basis of the opinion of a psychiatrist who stated that he could confidently predict Fields would be dangerous in the future. The psychiatrist testified that he did not know of any "standard psychiatric or medical procedures used in arriving at a determination or predicting future dangerousness" and that he was unaware of specific empirical data or studies. He issued his opinion without engaging in any testing or any other objective measures or use of an actuarial method. His basis for this opinion was discussions with the prosecutors and review of some records regarding the defendant. The defense attorney objected to the testimony as unreliable under the standards for expert testimony established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceutical (i.e., that proffered evidence must be grounded in scientific reasoning or methodology). The district court overruled the objections and allowed the expert testimony to go to the jury.
Explanation:
Answer:
Adverb
Explanation:
An adverb is a word that describes a verb , an adjective, another adverb , or even a whole sentence
