Answer:
Asia, America, and Africa.
Explanation:
From 1450-1750 European nations entered in the second wave of European colonization. British gain the majority of their African & European Empire.
Spain and Portugal occupied in America and established colonies where they got hold of wealth. Portugal colonizes in southern and west African regions. Cape town was also part of Portugal.
Dutch were famous for their fleet (merchant ships) in the world which allowed the Dutch East India Company to manage the spice trade in Indonesia.
France entered into fur trading in North America. Fur trading brought wealth in France.
The Ku Klux Klan is a terrorist organization that emerged in the United States at the turn of 1865 to 1866, shortly after the American Civil War. This group was created to <u>promote the ideals of white supremacism, racist ideals that promote segregation and hatred against blacks</u>. The group emerged with the intention of attacking blacks and civil rights defenders for African Americans.
The Klan, as it is called, was responsible for committing violent acts, such as burning houses inhabited by African-Americans, beatings, hangings, etc. Its members wore hoods and a white garment and had a cross as a symbol. In their meetings and attacks, they also set crosses on fire.
Klan's performance took place in three distinct phases, the third being the phase of the organization's current functioning. Klan today is a very small terrorist group. It has a few dozen cells spread throughout the American territory and a few thousand members
A) Grant favored defensive tactics while Lee relied on relentless offensive to win battles
Answer: I am pretty sure a good answe would be that Renaissance humanism, the guiding idea of Leonardo's time, valued human dignity and education, while seeking humanity's natural place within the universe. Because he loved the world as deeply as he studied it, Leonardo's work now symbolizes this philosophy
Explanation:
Hope this helped
:D
Answer:
In literary and historical analysis, presentism is the anachronistic introduction of present-day ideas and perspectives into depictions or interpretations of the past. Modern historians seek to avoid presentism in their work because they consider it a form of cultural bias, and believe it creates a distorted understanding of their subject matter.[1] The practice of presentism is regarded by some as a common fallacy when writing about the past.
