Answer:
Here are some changes to the textbook requirements that will simplify your work somewhat.
· The transaction requirements give you information on required tables. (page 339-340)
· Assume that ALL orders ship entirely, in other words there are no partial shipments. Either they ship the entire order or they wait until they have all the required units and then ship.
· Do not include the Customer PO information
Explanation:
Answer:
a. $965.74
b. $939.11
Explanation:
In this question we use the Present value formula i.e shown in the attachment below:
1. Given that,
Future value = $1,000
Rate of interest = 6.5%
NPER = 4 years
PMT = $1,000 × 5.5% = $55
The formula is shown below:
= -PV(Rate;NPER;PMT;FV;type)
So, after solving this, the price would be $965.74
2. Given that,
Future value = $1,000
Rate of interest = 6.5%
NPER = 8 years
PMT = $1,000 × 5.5% = $55
The formula is shown below:
= -PV(Rate;NPER;PMT;FV;type)
So, after solving this, the price would be $939.11
Answer:
Flashfone and Pictech
The Nash equilibrium is achieved when Pictech and Flashfone price their smartphones high without the other party changing their strategy.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Pictech
High Low
High 8 8 3 10
Flashfone
Low 10 3 5 5
b) By acting at the Nash equilibrium and pricing their smartphones high, Pictech and Flashfone achieve a payoff of $8 million respectively. This payoff level does not put any of the two firms at a disadvantage.
C. supplier relationship management is the answer