Answer:
foot-in-the-door
Explanation:
Foot-in-the-door technique: The foot-in-the-door technique is also referred to as FITD. This technique is defined as an individual making or posing a small request formerly to be able to ask for the bigger request from another person later on.
Example: In the question above, as Jennifer is making a small request for a ride to a nearby store and later on she asked for a ride to the attorney's office.
In other words, this is one of the compliance strategy which is directed towards getting an individual to agree for a big request by having the individual agree to a small request first.
See back then farming was really important and they weren't really industrialized uuntil after the civil war.
Answer:
4. Many different political ideologies were represented in the Reichstag
Explanation:
The statement about the Weimar Republic before November 1933 that is best supported by the chart is "Many different political ideologies were represented in the Reichstag"
In this statement, Maslow is arguing that not all of our needs are equally important. Some needs, such as food or thirst, are our priority, and only when we satisfy these do we begin to think about others such as love and self-esteem.
An example that shows this are people who live in extreme poverty and steal food. People in this situation would rather compromise their safety, freedom and maybe even self-worth in order to satisfy their hunger.
However, some evidence points to the opposite as well. For example, soldiers who join the war do so to fulfill abstract needs such as earning respect and finding meaning, even if this means risking their safety, having little to eat and facing many uncomfortable situations. Another example is athletes. Athletes train to a degree that is uncomfortable and hard. They also limit their food intake to certain types of food in order to achieve goals such as self-fulfillment and a higher self-esteem.
The answer is A.<span>concurring opinion supports a Supreme Court ruling, while a dissenting opinion opposes it
In concurring opinion, the judges will support the the decision by the court but with different basis/reasonns for its support.
In dissenting opinion on the hand, the judges are disagree with the decision by the court, but it wouldn't affect the previous outcome.</span>
