1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alona [7]
3 years ago
9

Why were southern senators fearful of having more free states than slave states

History
1 answer:
AleksandrR [38]3 years ago
7 0

Southern senators were fearful of having more free states than slave states because they did not want the balance of power to tip and them to be overpowered.

During this time, the balance of free states and slave states was very important. If there were more slave states than free states or vice versa, the balance of power may tip and one would overpower the other. Nobody wanted this, simply because nobody wanted to be drawn into unnecessary conflicts. This can be seen in the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which admitted Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state. This was so there would continue to be a balance between the two.

Southern citizens and officials were very fearful of there being more free states than slave states. As you may know, the South heavily relied on slavery and if they did not have it, their income would plummet. They were still focused on agriculture, unlike the North which was becoming more industrialized. In order to maintain their plantations, they wanted cheap labor, which they used slavery for. They feared that if there were more free states than slave states, they would lose representation and the free states would try to abolish slavery.

You might be interested in
Sovereignty of the People means. . . .
Svetlanka [38]

<u>SOVEREIGNITY </u>means the people are independent and have individual right and the people choose who represents them in the government.

4 0
3 years ago
US government!!!!!!
Yuliya22 [10]
1. Chief and Commander of Military
6 0
3 years ago
The Pax Romana (30 BC – AD 235) was two hundred years of Roman _____.
Dafna11 [192]
The Pax Romana (30 BC – AD 235) was two hundred years of Roman "peace" both domestically and internationally, since "Pax" means peace and "Romana" means "of Rome. 
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Name one area that is not represented by a cabinet position in which you think the president might need advice.
Brilliant_brown [7]

Answer:

Secretary of Defense. ...

8 0
3 years ago
Why did galileoś ideas represent a threat to the catholic church
Nikolay [14]

The Church taught the literal truth of the Bible, if something in the Bible could be proved false, it would shake the foundation of on which the Church was built.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  •  Identify the main group of European colonizers that changed New Mexico during the colonial era. Then, describe two lasting infl
    10·1 answer
  • Sixteenth- through nineteenth-century North American Indians most resisted European beliefs about ____
    10·1 answer
  • Help please ! asap
    8·1 answer
  • What does the word renaissance mean, and what does it signify about the Renaissance period in Western European history?
    8·2 answers
  • For what reason do elected officials mostly use social media​
    7·2 answers
  • Which words best describe the relationship between the Chinese communist party and the Chinese nationalists? Select all that app
    15·2 answers
  • What act limited immigration of people from China?
    7·1 answer
  • The statement that does NOT describe the 20th Amendment.
    10·2 answers
  • Which best describes the Battle of Trenton?
    9·1 answer
  • 1. Which of the following about Caesar is correct?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!