Undoubtedly, there needs to be a certain degree of arms proliferation in all countries in order to secure their borders from external or internal threats. However, when the military budget of countries like the USA, the world´s largest power, is far greater than the budget destined to meet other needs of the State, these latter ones are unavoidably neglected, to the detriment of the country´s people. On the other hand, if a greater budget is destined to the building of infrastructure, history shows —like in Japan and Germany— that the economy becomes less dependent on warfare and relies more on human capital and culture.
The question then becomes whether economic gain through arms proliferation is more advantageous to the welfare of the people or if the wellbeing of the people —through the building of infrastructure— is more beneficial to any given government. Since the wellbeing of the people is, in principle —based on the International Bill of Human Rights—, the aim of all countries, these should be more preoccupied with the building of infrastructure.
Answer:
1. a. Our nation's founders based their new government on old ideas.
This answer is correct because all other options are merely points made but not the primary subject of the paragraph. The passage is not focused on options b, c, or d.
2. c. Our democratic republic has ancient Greek and Roman roots.
This answer seems to be correct. The passage does explain that our nation's founders based their new government ideas on old ideas that primarily came from Rome and Greece.
3. d. Government is created to serve the people.
In my opinion, this option is the correct answer. According to the passage, the citizens were the one's to elect the representatives and what not. It does not mention much of the government protecting its people or making sure they had the strongest leader. The paragraph also does not mention the government keeping countries safe from war.
Answer:
Explanation:
cause its the main idea and it will help u answer the questions and stuff
Answer:
To link the findings of the research to the prior literature, all while pulling together some main themes of the results
Explanation:
The discussion section of scientific paper must make connections between the results and the prior research literature on the topic, such that the discussion decsribes how the study enhance the reader's understanding of the research problem from where it stopped at the end of the review of prior research.
Hence, in this case, the paper links the findings of the research to the prior literature, all while pulling together some main themes of the results, to advanced the readers' understanding of the research work.
