<span>The Vietnam War was a long, costly and divisive conflict that pitted the communist government of North Vietnam against South Vietnam and its principal ally, the United States. The conflict was intensified by the ongoing Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union. More than 3 million people (including over 58,000 Americans) were killed in the Vietnam War, and more than half of the dead were Vietnamese civilians. Opposition to the war in the United States bitterly divided Americans, even after President Richard Nixon ordered the withdrawal of U.S. forces in 1973. Communist forces ended the war by seizing control of South Vietnam in 1975, and the country was unified as the Socialist Republic of Vietnam the following year.</span>
The different schedules of reinforcement that the question is asking about are: Fixed ratio, f<span>ixed interval, variable ratio and variable interval.
Those are the four different intervals in conditioning that are usually mentioned.
Those which are "fixed" will be someohow regular, but we can see here that this is not the case here: she cannot expect some regularity in her acceptance rate, as every decision is independent of the other magazine's decisions.
Now it will be variable ratio - the more she submits, the bigger the chance, but at an unpredictable ratio. It won't be variable interval, since time is not relevant here, only the more
</span>
<span>The industrial revolution transformed the textile industry because there was a greater demand for textiles which forced inventors to invent machines to make supplies quicker. Also people going to factories to go to work instead of home. Hope this answers your question.</span>
Jackson and Adams were children; they both had different ideals on how the country should run, fought over it, and formed the two party system, the one Washington specifically warned about.
It is called "demand characteristic".
In experiments, especially in the subject of psychology, demand characteristics alludes to an experimental artifact where members shape an elucidation of the test's motivation and consciously or subconsciously change their conduct to fit that understanding. This influences information since members begin considering causal, gullible connections, and they endeavor to make sense of it this influences study’s end data.