Answer:
•The relationship between the twist and the wild type flower in the first crossing is known as a COMPLETE DOMINANCE
•The relationship between the forked and the wild type flower in the second crossing is also known as a COMPLETE DOMINANCE
•The relationship between the pale and the wild type flower in the third crossing is known as an INCOMPLETE DOMINANCE
Explanation:
A complete dominance is characterised by having one of the genes (the dominant gene) in an heterozygous condition, completely masking the effect of the other (the recessive gene) of thesame allelic pair. E.g. if the genes in allelic is represented with Aa, "A" is said to completely dominate "a" if it does not allow "a" to Express itself phenotypically.
The heterozygous condition is always the result of the F1 generation
and the F2 generation of a Complete dominance is always characterised by a phenotypic ratio of 3:1 which is in line with the results gotten from the first crossing and the second crossing as stated in the question.
An complete dominance is characterised by having an intermediate progeny in the F1 generation which was evident in the result of the third crossing. Also a phenotypic ratio of 1:2:1 in the F2 generation is also a characteristic feature of an Incomplete dominance relationship which was also evident in the third crossing.
This is an opinion question, meaning that if you back it up well enough you can't be wrong
Pros to oceans-hydro power
- cleaner (aka better for the environment)
- long term sustainability
- less expensive in the long term
Cons
- initially more expensive
- more hydro turbines are required to offset the energy gained from 1 coal burning plant
- potentially harmful to (a very limited) marine ecosystem
Just pick a side and back it up.
1. 50, 10grams passed through barrier to equalize
2. 50, same as 1
3. 40, can’t pass through barrier
4. 60, same as 3
5. water level rises in side2, lowers in side 1 because 10 grams of liquid passed through barrier
