Entertainment; actors, singers, etc.
<span>The question is incomplete, here is the complete question which I previously came across;</span>
When Janice went to work as a hair stylist in Rick's beauty shop, she entered into an agreement with Rick, whereby, if she left she would not work for another beauty shop within 50 miles for 2 years. Rick trained Janice in a number of new techniques. After nine months, Janice was offered a great job down the street at a new beauty shop, quit Rick, and had a number of customers follow her down the street to her new job. Rick claimed that she had signed a contract and had no right to go to work at the new shop. Janice disagreed and told Rick that no judge in the country would enforce such an agreement. Janice told Rick that she was more worried about a customer, Treena, who was threatening to sue her because her hair turned green after Janice worked on it. Janice agreed that Treena's hair was damaged. Janice pointed out, however, that she told Treena that odd results could result from a dye attempt, and she required that Treena sign a contract releasing Janice from all liabilities before she did anything with Treena's hair. Treena, however, sued anyway. The agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as?
The answer is, the agreement Rick and Janice entered into is referred to as "<span>covenant not to compete".</span>
<span>
</span>
It is hard
to decide if a judge will implement a non-competition agreement. While the privileged insights of a business are important,
the law additionally puts value to a person's opportunity to seek after other
work. To be enforceable Courts more often than not require that a contract not
to compete be sensible. In California, non-competes are adequately unlawful
except if you are selling a business. Different states will implement a few provisions,
as a rule the trade secret protection, however not the work limitations.
Answer:
10.02%
Explanation:
The computation of the WACC is shown below. The formula of WACC is shown below:
= (Weightage of debt × cost of debt) + (Weightage of preferred stock) × (cost of preferred stock) + (Weightage of common stock) × (cost of common stock)
= 27% × 7.6% × (1 - 0.40) + 9% × 5.9% + 64% × 12.9%
= 2.052% × (1 - 0.40) + 0.531% + 8.256%
= 10.02%
Answer:
$1,312.50
Explanation:
Calculation for How much was the referring agent paid
First step is to find the buyer agent amount by using the buyer's agent percentage to multiply the buyer purchased amount of the home
Using this formula
Buyer agent amount =Buyer's agent percentage× Home purchased amount
Let plug in the formula
Buyer agent amount=1.5%×$350,000
Buyer agent amount=$5,250
The last step is to find How much was the referring agent paid
Using this formula
Amount referring agent paid =Buyer agent amount× Percentage of buyer side commission
Let plug in the formula
Amount referring agent paid=$5,250×25%
Amount referring agent paid=$1,312.50
Therefore the amount that the referring agent paid will be $1,312.50
