If a policy change causes a Pareto improvement, is the outcome necessarily Pareto efficient if a policy change causes a Pareto improvement, then the outcome is not necessarily Pareto efficient this is because another change in the policy could cause another Pareto improvement.
A Pareto development is a development of a device whilst an alternative in the allocation of goods harms no person and advantages as a minimum one character. Pareto enhancements also are called "no-brainers" and are generally predicted to be rare, due to the plain and effective incentive to make any available Pareto development.
Factors that lie within the PPF display an inefficient or below-usage of resources – this is Pareto inefficient. A Pareto development way that output of both products can increase as we move from inside the PPF to factors at the PPF boundary.
Learn more about Pareto here:
brainly.com/question/7304310
#SPJ4
Based on the given scenario above, the correct answer for this would be option A. So based on Jessica's situation, the condition that the scenario describes would be UNLIMITED PERSONAL LIABILITY. Unlimited liability<span> refers to the legal obligations that one must assume. Hope this is the answer that you are looking for. </span>
Answer:
b. $103,345
Explanation:
Assets = Liabilities + Owner's Equity
Owner's Equity (Year 1) = $908,100 - $267,845
= $640,255
Owner's Equity (Year 2) = $980,279 - $233,892
= $746,387
increase in Owner's Equity = Owner's Equity (Year 2) - Owner's Equity (Year 1)
= $746,387 - $640,255
= $106,132
Net income during Year 2 = Increase in Owner's Equity - Additional investment + Withdrawals
= $106,132 - $28,658 + $25,871
= $103,345
Therefore, the amount of net income during Year 2 is $103.345.
Greer decision is linked with the inconsistency of the quality of services.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The consistency with which the service attributes anticipated for customers are delivered is a reliable measurement of total quality in the service industry. Consistency defines how sometimes you demonstrate and offer your clients the desired service quality.
Consistency of service is always expected by all customers; they want calm and no disagreeable surprises. In manufacturing, performance improvement is accomplished via a technique called statistical control of processes or SPC to minimize system uncertainty or variability.
For example, you can't create a consistent quality of service if you're prompt, correct and polite to certain of your customers, sometimes in all your branches. Therefore to say, good service turns into an error. Credibility will not be lasting or successful.
