All categories

2 years ago

Data related to the acquisition of timber rights and intangible assets during the current year ended December 31 are as follows:

Business

1 answer:

poizon [28]2 years ago

4 0

Solution:

Given :

Timber rights were purchased for = $1,600,000

The stand of the timber is = 5,000,000 board feet

Goodwill impaired by the company = $3,750,000

Timber cut and sold during current year = 1,100,000 board feet

Government legal cost = $6,600,000

Therefore the amount of amortization , depletion and the impairment of the current year for each foregoing item are :

Item Impairment, Amortization or the depletion

a). $ 352,000

b). $ 3,750,000

c). $ 412,500

2. Jornalizing the entries that required to record the depletion, amortization or the impairment of each of the items are :

a). The depletion expense = $ 352,000

Accumulated expense = $ 352,000

b). Loss from the impaired goodwill = $3,750,000

The goodwill = $3,750,000

c). Amortization expenses patent= $412500

Patent = $412500

You might be interested in

If real GDP increases, A. the money demand curve shifts to the right. B. there is a movement down along a stationary money dema

qaws [65]

Answer:

A. The money demand curve shifts to the right.

4 0

3 years ago

Given the following historical demand, what is the weighted moving average forecast (0.4, 0.3, 0.3) for Week 6?

Roman55 [17]

Answer:

The correct option is B. 9200.

Explanation:

This can simply be answered as follows:

$F_{6} =(D_{5}*W_{5})+(D_{4}*W_{4})+(D_{3}*W_{3})$ .................. (1)

Where:

$F_{6}$ = Weighted moving average forecast (0.4, 0.3, 0.3) for Week 6 = ?

$D_{5}$ = Week 5 demand = 11,000

$D_{4}$ = Week 4 demand = 9,000

$D_{3}$ = Week 3 demand = 7,000

The (0.4, 0.3, 0.3) implies that:

$W_{5}$ = Weight of Week 5 demand = 0.4

$W_{4}$ = Weight of Week 4 demand = 0.3

$W_{3}$ = Weight of Week 3 demand = 0.3

Substituting all the relevant values into equation (1), we have:

$F_{6}$ = (11,000 * 0.40) + (9,000 * 0.30) + (7,000 * 0.30) = 9,200

Therefore, the correct option is B. 9200.

7 0

2 years ago

Which of the following cash budget equations is incorrect? Multiple Choice Period one ending cash balance = period two beginning

iris [78.8K]

Answer:

Cash payments + cash receipts = cash requirements

Explanation:

The cash budget is a budget which deals in a inflow and outflow of cash. The inflow of cash refers to the incoming of cash through receipts while the outflow of cash refers to the outgoing of cash through payments

It interprets the liquidity of the business organization whether organization has enough cash or it can be borrowed for running its organization

Therefore, the Cash payments + cash receipts = cash requirements is wrong as other equations that are given are right

7 0

3 years ago

The Playa Company has the following information in its records. Certain data have been intentionally omitted ($ in thousands). R

Zinaida [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

using the following formulars

Net purchase = (Gross Purchase) - (purchase return) - (purchase discount) + freight-in

Beginning inventory + Net purchases = cost of goods available for sales

Cost of goods sold = cost of goods available for sale - ending inventory

for 2013 we have that

beginning inventory = cost of goods available for sale - net purchases

Net purchases = 630 - 24 - 18 + 13 = 601

2013, beginning inventory = 876- 601 = 275

Ending inventory = 876 - 627 = 249

2014,

Begning inventory = closing inventory of 2013 = 249

Cost of goods available for sale = 621 + 225 = 846

Net purchase -Cost of goods available for sale - beginning inventory = 846 - 249 = 597

Gross purchase = 597 + 15 + 30 - 32 = 610

2015

Cost of good sold = 800 - 216 = 784

Net purchase = 800 - 225 = 575

purchase discount = 585 -575 - 14 + 16 = 12

4 0

2 years ago

Rick prepared financial statements for MegaCorp knowing that it was going to use his statements to apply for a loan with Big Ban

Ymorist [56]

Answer:

The correct answer is the option D: Both the foreseeable doctrine and the restatement doctrine.

Explanation:

On the one hand, the <em>foreseeable doctrine</em> dictates that there is a limit in the liability of party for those acts that he has done and that carry a risk of foreseeable harm. Therefore that this point of view establishes that a reasonable person would be able to understand and so to know when a certain action would bring certain damages to another party.

On the oher hand, the <em>restatement doctrine</em> establishes that there are a set of treatises on legal subjects that primarily are looking for to inform judges and lawyers about general principles of common law. And therefore that those treatises will help both the judge and the lawyers at the time of the trial when the person has to go to court.

3 0

3 years ago