Answer:C
Explanation: Because if a nondemocratic gets hold of the government and there is unrest people protesting they will must likely respond with force. Then that will make the people madder at the government they were already mad and instead of the government to talk it out and try to fix the problem they will attack that will only make the people madder. They will feel as if they cant trust the government and if there is no trust that is really bad there becomes even more chaos.
Answer:
1. First hand experience of poverty.
2. The United States was not invaded nor thoroughly destroyed.
3. Economic help.
Explanation:
1. Marshall came from a settler family in Virginia. His father suffered financial difficulties when George entered the Military Institute.
2. Marshall, who served in the first and in the second world war, had a more than average knowledge of the European continent. For him, having seen the destruction of Europe after world war II, he was aware that it might be difficult to explain the needs of millions of Europeans to Americans save at home in a country that didn´t suffer (civilians) like other countries did.
3. As my (grand)parents in the Netherlands once told me, the most difficult years of the world war came when it ended. There was nothing to eat.
The Netherlands, like most devastated European countries, urgently needed economically help in order to build up what was utterly destroyed.
Tip: look for the movie Europe by Lars von Trier.
Hey the answer is
•Apprentice- took years to learn a trade
•Machinery- allowed people to learn how to perform a task in a few days
•People no longer had to be really skilled in the work they did
Now pls thank me
Answer:
She should be prosecuted
Explanation:
In order to convict a defendant of malicious destruction of property, the Commonwealth must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that:
The defendant destroyed or damaged the personal property, building, or dwelling house of another person;
The defendant did so willfully; and.
The defendant acted with malice.
I copied this online, so don't copy, but this shows why you could convict Tracy of the crime. She destroyed people's personal property, their phones, which she did willfully. This goes to show why she should be prosecuted and charged. Thanks, and I hope this helps! BRAINLIEST PLEASE!
