Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
"Rosa, who operates a Street Tacos restaurant in her apartment, is charged with criminal violations of the local health and building codes, state license regulations, and federal environmental statutes. To obtain a conviction, the prosecution must
a. persuade three-fourths of the jurors to agree on a guilty verdict. b. show the evidence as reasonably permitting a guilty verdict. c. convince the court it is more likely than not that the charges are true d. prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Rosa committed every essential element of an offense."
Answer:
b. show the evidence as reasonably permitting a guilty verdict.
Explanation:
When convicting someone for the practice of a criminal offense, the judge imposes the penal sanction that the law provides: penalties of imprisonment, detention, simple imprisonment, restrictive rights and a fine. This conviction has other effects, both criminal and extra-penal. However, for a conviction to be carried out, the judge must reach a conclusion that the defendant is guilty. In order to reach this conclusion, it is necessary to show evidence that proves that the defendant is acting in disagreement with the law and therefore should be punished.
In the case shown in the question, for Rosa to receive a sentence, the charge imposed on her must show evidence as reasonably allowing a guilty verdict.
Based on the previous works, Durkheim felt that creating a society without crime would be <u>impossible</u>.
<h3>Emile Durkheim</h3>
Emile Durkheim is a famous French sociologist who was generally considered as one of the fathers of modern social science alongside the likes of Karl Max and Max Weber.
In one of his submissions, he concluded that it is <u>impossible</u> to create a society without crime.
According to him, some minor crimes are essential and valuable to society. Otherwise, society could not exist without it.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "<u>Impossible</u>."
Learn more about Durkheim here: brainly.com/question/8837353
Answer:
tomb
Explanation tell me if I'm right plz mark me brainlest.;)
Said to be the same type of stimulus to the Texas Revolution that the Stamp Act was to the American Revolution, was initiated by Lucas Alamán y Escalada, Mexican minister of foreign relations, and was designed to stop the flood of immigration from the United States to Texas. The law came as a result of the warning and communications of Manuel de Mier y Terán, who made fourteen recommendations directed toward stimulating counter-colonization of Texas by Mexicans and Europeans, encouraging military occupation, and stimulating coastal trade.
Answer:
first one
Explanation:
Surely, Centers for Disease Control in the Dept of Health and Human Services
