Answer:
White Europeans and Americans used Charles Darwin's theory on evolution to justify Europe's imperialism in the following manner:
b. They cited evolution to explain that the peoples they conquered were an inferior race and needed their leadership.
Explanation:
Imperialists used Social Darwinism as an excuse to justify their interference or dominance in other countries. According to the ideas expressed, white Europeans and Americans were more evolved than other peoples and, for that reason, it was not only their right but also their duty to conquer them. They claimed to be doing those countries a favor. A very good example of this idea is Rudyard Kipling's poem "The White Man's Burden," in which he portrays the dominated people as inferior, childish, and heretic.
Answer:
Hi srry i cant answer but are you at any point from PSB?
Explanation: just a hunch btw
<u>Answer:
</u>
Psychosocial development refers to how our mind is changing
.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Psychosocial development or the "Theory of psychosocial development" as defined by Erikson with the help of Joan Erikson constitutes eight stages from infancy to adulthood which an individual must successfully pass in order to have a healthy development. There are various goals all along the way created by conflicts and consequences, that must be met.
If an individual reconciles with the conflicts of one stage, he emerges from that stage with the associated virtue of the same. If he fails to do so, these might present as conflicts later again in the subsequent stages which he will have to solve later. Each of these stages is temporary and the success in the previous stage is not a prerequisite to enter into the next one.
Marks explains that we have been made to believe that conflict is bad and compromise is good. He describes this as a vision that is too simplistic to be upheld by the nations of the world. Marks says it will be difficult to determine whether conflict is good or bad if we do not understand the people involved in the conflict, the cause and the strategy involved in the conflict.
He said compromise, contrary to general belief, can be harmful if it does not protect the vulnerable and the dis-empowered.
Marks gave an example of a United Nations agency that collaborated with the federal and local governments, television company, and even a multinational soda company in order to address the problem of poor sanitation in schools in India. This arrangement helped the corporation to promote their brands and products. Marks argued that, the United Nations were creating another problem while trying to solve one by promoting a soda company, knowing fully well that a large consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages increases the risk of obesity.
The mistake governments make, according to Marks, when they collaborate with industries is that they conflate the common good with common ground. They sacrifice the interest of the people on the alter of industrial collaboration.
By saying that governments should struggle or engage in conflicts with corporations, Marks means that the corporations always act to promote their commercial interests while government is saddled with the responsibility of promoting the common good, they should not leave this responsibility while trying to go into relationship with the corporations.
I have had cause to go into conflict with a police officer in my state because he demanded a bribe from me despite having all my driving particulars. I shouted at him and promise to report him to the authority if he did not desist from that practice. he became scared and allowed me to go.
Answer: a) Personal Fable
Explanation:
Personal fable is the personal belief that is held by a person which makes them feel that they are unique or persist special traits as compared to others. They also believe that any difficultly or mishappening cannot take place in their life due to their act.
According to question, Jerome is displaying personal fable personality because he thinks that he has exceptional driving skills and thus. he will never face any accident due to his fast and careless driving.
Other options are incorrect because arguer, imaginary audience and relative reasoning is not displayed through question's scenario. Thus, the correct option is option(a).
