Personally if I were to answer this base on my own polite opinion, if a document reaches me, and it requires me to perform some action, I would do it immediately if it <span>seems important but not urgent.
The answer is letter B then.</span>
Answer:
net income exceeded the free cash flows by $550 million
Explanation:
net income = ($8,250 - $5,750 - $1,000 - $160) x (1 - 35%) = $871 million
net cash flows:
operating activities = $871 + $1,000 - $300 = $1,571
investing activities = ($1,250)
net cash increase during the year = $321 million
net income exceeded the free cash flows by $871 - $321 = $550 million
Answer:
$176,400
Explanation:
Life insurance need = 0.70 × Salary amount × 7
= 0.70 × $36,000 × 7
= $176,400
Therefore using the easy method the amountof insurance that Stephanie should carry is $176,400
Answer:
D.
Municipal bond because the equivalent taxable yield is 6.6%
Explanation:
we should make the important difference that municipal bonds are tax free while corporate bonds don't.
Therefore we should solve for the after tax rate fo the corporate bond:
The corporate bond as a yield of 4.5% after taxes which is lower than the municipal bond. This make it more attractive
We can also solve for the pre-tax rate of the municipal bond:
the municipal bonds would be equivalent to a 6.6% corporate bonds.
This makes option D correct.
Answer:
D : All options are correct
Explanation:
- The marginal buyer is the essence of demand curve while marginal seller is essence of supply curve.
- @ Q = 500 units, Selling Price is set at SP = $35
- @ Q = 500 units, Buying Price is set at BP = $40
- Since, SP ≠ BP our equilibrium price would be $ 37.5 assuming the price elasticity of demand and supply are equal. In any case the equilibrium price would lie in between [ 35 , 40 ] such that to prevent a shortage of units in near future.
- Moreover, if the seller decides to sell at price $35 then he must sell goods greater than 500 units to reach the equilibrium profits. However, it could also lead to excess of units or surplus.
- We see that from selling the goods at SP = $35 while the buyer is willing to pay BP = $40 for 500 goods, the seller would be under-profiting and would be earning $5*500 = $2,500 less than he would at equilibrium price of $40 and selling units greater than 500. Hence, 500 goods is not an efficient quantity of goods.
