Answer:
(E) ensuring the customer understands the company's history.
Explanation:
Approach phase is the third stage of selling process, in this the sales person meets the customer for the first time.
First 2 steps are prospecting and preparation.
Under prospecting the customers are identified who needs the products of the company.
Under preparation the slides are prepared about the company's product, that how it will be presented to the customer.
Under approach stage the salesperson meets the customer, and introduces where he came from, why he came, ad what does the company do.
After that only he further moves to understand and confirm with the estimated needs of customer.
Thus, statement (E) confirms that the customer knows about the company, and why the salesperson is here to meet him.
<span>Which are examples of a person changing careers? Check all that apply.
a home insurance salesman decides to start selling home warranties instead
a farmer decides to start practicing real estate and selling local land
a biology teacher moves to teach the elective cooking classes for that school year -> same career field of teaching, just a different line of work within for the school year
a factory worker who manufactures linens moves to a new factory that manufactures pencils -> same career which is a factory worker, he just moved to a different line of work in the same career
a crab fisherman decides to start a business maintaining local boats</span>
Answer:
The remaining part of the question is:
A) clan culture.
B) goal-driven agenda.
C) adhocracy culture.
D) market culture.
E) focused approach.
Correct Answer:
D) <u>market culture.
</u>
<u></u>
Explanation:
His suggestion of his research and development team to develop innovative products for the emerging changes in markets for his customers shows that, Jacuzzi Warehouse has a market culture.
Answer:
1.Parties [Identify the plaintiff and the defendant] - The plaintiff is Henry Keller of H.K.Enterprises and the defendant is Bank of Nigeria and Nigerian individuals Central Bank of Nigeria, Paul Ogwuma, ?Alhaji Rasheed, Alhaji M.A. Sadiq.
2.Facts [Summarize only those facts critical to the outcome of the case] - The case was filed by Keller against the defendants in United States. The case was filed under Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) as the plaintiff found himself a victim of fraud and financial scam.The scam occured when one of the defendants approached the plaintiff who was the sales representative of medical equipments for granting him the distribution rights for Nigeria. The expected amount of money was not transferred in the account of plaintiff inspite of his attempts of meeting the requirements of the defendants. The defendants acted on the behalf of Central Bank of Nigeria and as Nigerian individuals.
3.Procedure [Who brought the appeal? What was the outcome in the lower court(s)?] - The appeal was filed by the defendants Central Bank of Nigeria,?Paul Ogwuma, Alhaji Rasheed, Alhaji M.A. Sadiq. The lower court gave the decision that the claims of fraud and misrepresentation do not hold against the defendants as the plaintiff entered into an arrangement with them which is not legal and as per the rules. However the lower court ruled that immunity cannot be given under FSIA to the defendants as the commercial activity is an exception and claims for violation of RICO are applicable on them.
4. Issue [Note the central question or questions on which the case turns] - The case turns on the appeal of defendants to be granted immunity under Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. The ruling indicated that the defendants have sovereign authority. Also, the commercial activity clause did not apply in this case as the activity was not done in United States and did not meet the legal standards of a commercial activity.
5.Explain the applicable law(s). - Applicable laws are Common law fraud, violations of RICO(Rackteer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act), Misrepresentation.
6.Holding [How did the court resolve the issue(s)? Who won?] - The court resolved the issue by giving a decision in the favor of defendants by ruling that immunity is given to Foreign nationals under FSIA and dismissed any claims filed against them under RICO.
7.Reasoning [Explain the logic that supported the court's decision] - The logic supporting the court's decision is that the arrangement between the plaintiff and defendants including the signed contract was not as per the laws and rules and was not legally compliant. Moreover the commercial activity was out of bounds for United states so the exception to FISA is not applicable. The defendants claimed that they did not enter into the contract with the plaintiff.
Explanation:
