The actions that Susan made are clearly an irruption to someone’s privacy. With that said, basically, Susan is a person whose abilities allow her to meddle into someone’s business without their permission. This is what people usually call as “privacy violation” since the person who is stealing someone’s information is doing it without them to know.
Hacking is a very common activity nowadays. There are some apps and tools that facilitate this kind of task,s for hackers. Sometimes they have their own hacking software but it is pretty common to do it throughout programming.
The problem with this kind of activities is that it is a moral dilemma since it is a cybernetic felony that send people to jail and sometimes they also have to pay a bail in order to not to go to prison if they are discovered and caught. In the worst scenery, people that commit this type of crimes, are both convicted and forced to pay the bail.
Most of the time, people or enterprises are hacked because their system is very vulnerable so that makes it really easy to hack. This is one of the reasons for the new type of security that is being implemented in people’s computers in order to avoid this type of misfortunes that currently affect many people around the world.
To summarize, Susan’s occupation can be described as a chain of risky activities that she has to do in order to avoid being discovered by the person she attacked; so that, she always must be very careful to not let any trace behind her actions.
Answer:
A city mayor's office would have a ".gov" domain
Explanation:
<em>The Declaration of Independence establishes the values of the United States of America. It says that "all men are created equal" and have the right to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Further, it states the purpose of government is to protect these values.</em>
Elaboration/Explanation:
One big source for Jefferson was John Locke. Locke’s Second Treatise of Government built upon mutual respect for property rights. All free men own property and therefore deserve some rights. The more property, the more rights. Locke like Jefferson believed that kings only earned respect for their rights when they respected the rights and privileges of their subjects.
Jefferson, of course, took this further. He, Franklin, and some other founding fathers essentially ran in radical English circles. Therefore some rights were so important that they do not accrue according to property ownership. Hence, all men were created equal in some respects; even though major property holders were more equal. All men deserved the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Of course, Jefferson understood that large landholders exercised the rights of gentry to guide their poorer neighbors.
It was the growth of jails. Many staffs were getting paid poorly.
