<u>Answer:
</u>
- Wright Mill
- Power elite
- Conflicts
- G. William Domhoff
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Wright Mill was an American sociologist. He believes that a person should be imaginative and that is very to learn and survive in society. He believes that social changes happened always for the betterment. He is also known as the modern father of conflict theory. He said that society always goes under dynamic changes that are scarce. The theory is focused on the competition and distribution of resources, power, and sources. It is good at explaining the social changes but bad at social stability.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
There are certain rules and standards that are important when carrying out a research and since a group of men are interested in a particular research, it is the same rules guiding the research that these set of people will have to follow.
It is going to be a collective breakthrough and its the same rules and standards for scientific practice that will lead them to it.
So yes it is true that men whose research is based on shared paradigms are committed to same rules and standards for scientific practice.
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the third choice "Scandivania"
They call it the Nordic Model.
Although there are significant differences among the Nordic countries, they all share some common traits. These include support for a "universalist" welfare state aimed specifically at enhancing individual autonomy and promoting social mobility<span>; a </span>corporatist<span> system involving a tripartite arrangement where representatives of labor and employers negotiate wages and labor market policy mediated by the government;</span><span>and a commitment to widespread </span>private ownership<span>, free markets and </span>free trade.
I hope my answer has come to your help. God bless and have a nice day ahead!
Answer:
The answer is B. Pharaohs
Answer:
c) The individuals who were relatively unprejudiced became even less prejudiced and the individuals who were relatively prejudiced became even more prejudiced.
Explanation:
Myers and Bishop (1970) conducted studies where groups of relatively prejudiced and unprejudiced high school students had discussions on issues involving racial attitudes.
According to these studies the individuals who were relatively unprejudiced became even less prejudiced and the individuals who were relatively prejudiced became even more prejudiced.
