Answer:
<h3>The comparison and contrast of Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification with Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification lies on the concept of social position and power.</h3>
Explanation:
Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective of social stratification and Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification all emphasize on the presence of a power structure in a society which directly corresponds to the position of an individual. They all believed that society operates according to the social needs and that every individual performs their tasks accordingly.
The line of distinction between Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective and Mosca’s conflict perspective lies in the nature of men. Mosca believes that man is evil and dominating by nature and that compels him/her to misuse his position. He brings out the authority and power of the ruling class as an example to this argument. He argues that people in good position will eventually become more powerful as men are ambitious and selfish. They will gradually exploit people from lower position and use their power for their own personal gains.
While on the other hand, Davis and Moore argue that the greater the role of an individual is, the greater should be the reward. They illustrate the idea that people with bigger and greater roles should be given more importance because of their greater contributions to the society. Their perspective of social stratification emphasize that not everyone can perform the exclusive task of the doctors, therefore those who could perform such complicated tasks should be paid and rewarded more. Davis and Moore do not consider misuse of position and power by people of great influence.
In my opinion, Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification is more applicable and realistic. The fact that those who worked hard deserves a reward is a universal doctrine. These people spent a lot of effort and time before acquiring the position they are in today. Their effort and hard work should be rewarded greatly as they will contribute significantly to the society. Though, this perspective does not bring into account the chances of misuse of power and position, such elements can be controlled through efficient law and state control.
Answer:
Im pretty sure the Irish fought on both sides
Explanation:
The practice or skill of providing an alternative course of action in the presence of an issue is called Problem Solving.
It is the process of observing the immediate environment, identifying things that ought to be changed, and taking steps to implement those changes.
<h3>What are the benefits of Problem Solving?</h3>
Problem-solving is an important skill because:
- It helps one to think outside the box
- it helps one to work under pressure
- it helps one to deal with risk
- it is critical to the prioritization, planning, and execution strategies.
Learn more about problem-solving in the link below:
brainly.com/question/10708306
The Tet Offensive was a communist attack during the Vietnam war, and it was considered a turning point in the war. It was geared to slowly and painfully push America out of Vietnam.
Walter is in
"<span>
Exhaustion stage".</span>
Hans Selye's general adaptation syndrome clarifies how our
body reacts to pressure. The third stage is exhaustion<span>. There are three phases of pressure: the alarm, resistance
and exhaustion stages. The alarm is otherwise called the battle or flight stage.
When you're in the alarm stage, your heart pulsates speedier, sending more
blood to your arms and legs in the event that you have to battle or escape. </span>
