![\bf \textit{difference and sum of cubes} \\\\ a^3+b^3 = (a+b)(a^2-ab+b^2) ~\hfill a^3-b^3 = (a-b)(a^2+ab+b^2) \\\\[-0.35em] \rule{34em}{0.25pt}\\\\ \boxed{a^6+b^6}\implies a^{2\cdot 3}+b^{2\cdot 3}\implies (a^2)^3+(b^2)^3 \\[2em] [a^2+b^2] [(a^2)^2-a^2b^2+(b^2)^2]\implies \boxed{(a^2+b^2)(a^4-a^2b^2+b^4)}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Ctextit%7Bdifference%20and%20sum%20of%20cubes%7D%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%20a%5E3%2Bb%5E3%20%3D%20%28a%2Bb%29%28a%5E2-ab%2Bb%5E2%29%20~%5Chfill%20a%5E3-b%5E3%20%3D%20%28a-b%29%28a%5E2%2Bab%2Bb%5E2%29%20%5C%5C%5C%5C%5B-0.35em%5D%20%5Crule%7B34em%7D%7B0.25pt%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%5Cboxed%7Ba%5E6%2Bb%5E6%7D%5Cimplies%20a%5E%7B2%5Ccdot%203%7D%2Bb%5E%7B2%5Ccdot%203%7D%5Cimplies%20%28a%5E2%29%5E3%2B%28b%5E2%29%5E3%20%5C%5C%5B2em%5D%20%5Ba%5E2%2Bb%5E2%5D%20%5B%28a%5E2%29%5E2-a%5E2b%5E2%2B%28b%5E2%29%5E2%5D%5Cimplies%20%5Cboxed%7B%28a%5E2%2Bb%5E2%29%28a%5E4-a%5E2b%5E2%2Bb%5E4%29%7D)
about the second one... well, is a "fait accompli" that using the pythagorean theorem, if x = 8 and y = 5, the hypotenuse must be √(8² + 5²) = √(89), which is neither of those choices.
5, 8, 13 are no dice, namely 5² + 8² ≠ 13
25, 64, 17 is are no dice too, because 25² + 17² ≠ 64²
however, 5,12 and 13 are indeed a pythagorean triple
also is 39, 80, 89.
when looking for a pythagorean triple, recall that c² = a² + b².
so the longest leg is the sum of the square of the small ones.
so what you'd do is, check the small legs, square them, add them up, if they're indeed a pythagorean triple, they "must" add up to the longest leg.
Answer:
24
Step-by-step explanation:
3x+6=30
Get the co-efficient by itself
3x +6=30
-6. -6
3x=24
Divide by 3 on both sides
24/3
x =8
Yes. If the segment only has 2 points, it can be named both ways.
First, you need convert the decimals into fraction
0.26 = 26/100 = 13/50
The next step would be drawing 50 small boxes on a piece of paper. Make it colorless.
The final stap would be giving 13 out of those 50 boxes with different color (such as black), and you're done
Answer:
14.93
Step-by-step explanation:
For this problem you need to know distance formula, which is
d=√(x2-x1)²+(y2-y1)². You'll want to plug in (0,3) and (-2, 9) and go on to plug in all of them at some point. You'll get 6.32 as the distance between (0,3) and (-2, 9), 3.61 as the distance between (-2, 9) and (-4, 6), and 5 as the distance between (-4, 6) and (0, 3). You add them up and get your answer.
