how each of these "w"? im guessing it means work. and three weapons from then that are "new"? are:
Rifles. All nations used more than one type of firearm during the First World War. The rifles most commonly used by the major combatants were, among the Allies, the Lee-Enfield .303 (Britain and Commonwealth), Lebel and Berthier 8mm (France), Mannlicher–Carcano M1891, 6.5mm (Italy), Mosin–Nagant M1891 7.62 (Russia), and Springfield 1903 .30–06 (USA). The Central Powers employed Steyr–Mannlicher M95 (Austria-Hungary and Bulgaria), Mauser M98G 7.92mm (Germany), and Mauser M1877 7.65mm (Turkey). The American Springfield used a bolt-action design that so closely copied Mauser’s M1989 that the US Government had to pay a licensing fee to Mauser, a practice that continued until America entered the war.
Machine guns. Most machine guns of World War 1 were based on Hiram Maxim’s 1884 design. They had a sustained fire of 450–600 rounds per minute, allowing defenders to cut down attacking waves of enemy troops like a scythe cutting wheat. There was some speculation that the machine gun would completely replace the rifle. Contrary to popular belief, machine guns were not the most lethal weapon of the Great War. That dubious distinction goes to the artillery.
Flamethrowers. Reports of infantry using some sort of flame-throwing device can be found as far back as ancient China. During America’s Civil War some Southern newspapers claimed Abraham Lincoln had observed a test of such a weapon. But the first recorded use of hand-held flamethrowers in combat was on February 26, 1915, when the Germans deployed the weapon at Malancourt, near Verdun. Tanks carried on a man’s back used nitrogen pressure to spray fuel oil, which was ignited as it left the muzzle of a small, hand-directed pipe. Over the course of the war, Germany utilized 3,000 Flammenwerfer troops; over 650 flamethrower attacks were made. The British and French both developed flame-throwing weapons but did not make such extensive use of them.
there are many more, but here are 3 i found from a trustworthy source!
Answer:
B, penetration pricing
Explanation:
Penetration pricing is a pricing strategy in which a manufacturer sets the price of its product low for a start so as to have a wide reach and acceptability in the market.
This pricing strategy is meant to make customers ditch their usual product for the new product, thereby having the new product attracting customers to itself.
Ultimately, penetration pricing increases market share of the new product manufacturer as it gains a lot of customers within the shortest possible time.
Penetration helps to discourage new product entrance into the market thus giving the product a large/high stock turnover throughout the product's distribution channel.
In the above question, Frito lay introduced its chips at a low price of 69cents for a period of time (first few months, say 3 or 4 months for example) in order to gain market share quickly.
Cheers
Answer:
A
Explanation:
By definition, open-market operations change the monetary base.
In this exercise, the Fed engages in open-market purchases, which means that the Fed expands the amount of money in the banking system. Therefore the monetary base will increase by an amount equal to the amount of open-market purchases.
So monetary base will increase by $3 billion.
Answer:
The correct answer is option c.
Explanation:
If there is an appreciation in the value of the dollar, it implies that the value of the dollar has increased in comparison to foreign currency. This means that foreign consumers will need to pay more for US goods. This will cause a decline in export demand.
Because of the decline in exports, the net exports will fall. This decrease in the net exports will cause the aggregate demand to fall. As a result, the aggregate demand curve will shift to the left.
