Answer:
a. The supplier has more bargaining power than the firm.
Explanation:
This is an example of one of Porters' five forces. The supplier has a monopoly and thus entertains a high market share. This means that the supplier has more bargaining power than the firm as if the firm wants the ceramic there are no alternative options available for the firm; however, if the firm does not want supplies, the supplier can find plenty of firms that may need the ceramic thus making supplier more powerful than the firm.
Hope that helps.
Answer:
Interest paid in cash in 2018 = $0
Interest recognized on the Income statement = $1,800
Liabilities recognized = $90,000
Amount paid for Principal and interest = $93,600
Interest reported on 2019 Income statement = 1800
Explanation:
Interest paid in cash in 2018 is zero because interest and principal were paid in cash on the maturity date.
Interest recognized in 2018 = 90000*0.08*3/12 = $1800
liabilities are recognized at original amount because the interest is not capitalized and no payment made thus far.
Amount paid on maturity date is 93,600 ( 90000 principal, 3600 interest)
interest reported is for three months jan - march
Answer:
create specific budgets for things like vacations or a wedding
calculate the amount of mortgage payments or car payments
Answer: Computer monitor
Explanation:
A complementary good is a good that's used together with another good. A good example of a complementary good is a car and petrol since they are used together.
A complementary good for computer hard drives would be the computer monitor. The monitor simply looks like a television and it helps in showing the information which is being displayed.
Answer:
c. The medical center will prevail based upon the written contract
Explanation:
Since they later signed a written contract where it is stated in paper and has their signature that the medical center could not assure nor take any responsibilities for the birth of a kid without any medical, mental or physical defects the medical center has the upperhand on the court, as well as they did in Scalisi et al. v. New York University Medical Center that promised a perfect designed baby, the Scalsi decided for invitro fertilization because of the wife´s family medical history and tendency to autism, and they ended up with a baby with autism, so they sue the New York University Medical center, but the court sided with the NYUMC because of the written contract where it stated that they couldn´t assure the baby to be born without any medica, mental or physical defects.
