1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
exis [7]
3 years ago
6

Which two sentences explain the North's opposition to the use of slavery in the South?

History
2 answers:
Gre4nikov [31]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Which two sentences explain the North's opposition to the use of slavery in the South?

The population of enslaved people increased the South's representation in Congress.

Northerners saw slavery as an immoral and unjust practice.

Northern farmers couldn’t compete with Southern plantations supported by the labor of enslaved people.

Southerners refused to trade enslaved people with plantation owners in the North.

The North believed that slavery prevented the South from using modern farm equipment.

THIS IS MULTIPLE CHOICE!!!

uranmaximum [27]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

northerners saw slavery as immoral and unjust practice

Northern farmers couldn’t compete with southern plantations supported by the labor if enslaved people

Explanation: I did the test and got 100%

You might be interested in
In the study of history what is one major difference between a region and a period?
Vanyuwa [196]
Region is a section of a country or continent. A period is a type of why to say a certain amount of time.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following best describes the influences on how elected representatives vote on bills? (1 point)
Iteru [2.4K]
The answer is B.) Personal attitudes, party affiliation, and constituent wishes all affect representatives' votes
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does the Portrait of King Henry VIII shows his power and wealth?
alekssr [168]

You would be forgiven for thinking that Princess Diana had very little in common with Henry VIII or the artist Hans Holbein. But you would be wrong. The Tudors invented the portrait as a means of projecting personality, often by linking striking images with words.

If you look at any member of the Royal family in the last few hundred years capable of playing the same game, it’s the late Princess of Wales, posing alone in front of the Taj Mahal, anticipating the headlines.

In the first episode of a new series, The Genius of British Art, I will be examining how royal portraiture has reflected and defined the changing face of England. Five other presenters, including Jon Snow and Sir Roy Strong, will then explore other areas of our artistic heritage, from war art to landscapes.

In so many ways, the Tudor reign was transformative, and art is no exception. In 16th-century England, the idea of using a painting to capture and transmit the personality of a ruler was revolutionary. Until then, royal portraits consisted of a squiggle and a crown on a coin or a seal – they were merely tokens. But if you look at Hans Holbein’s 1537 portrait of Henry VIII, what you see is the man himself: there are no royal emblems, no crown, no flummery. The painting shows the King in all his thuggish dignity, a rugger player gone to seed. While paint can flatter or lie, steel in the form of a made-to-measure suit of armour with a 54-inch waist cannot. It’s clear from Henry’s surviving armour that the painting shows his actual, hulking physique.

There were two factors which drove this transformation of the portrait. One was the Renaissance: English artists and thinkers were influenced by continental Europe’s urge to recreate the lavish, realistic art of Rome. The second was the Reformation. The idea of English identity was invented in Henry’s reign after the break from the Catholic Church and Rome; you could say that he was the first Eurosceptic.


6 0
3 years ago
Which statement best explains the importance of the Yangtze River to ancient Chinese civilizations? (i will give lots of points
rjkz [21]

Answer:The answer is A

Explanation: it was important for “transportation, water, irrigation, Sanitation, boundary-marking and war” the only option that gose with the statement is A

6 0
3 years ago
Who was considered the first missionary?<br><br> Cicero<br> Abraham<br> Paul<br> Jesus
KengaRu [80]

Answer:

Paul

Explanation:

The Apostle Paul was the first missionary to travel to spread the Gospel.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • On September 11,2001, why was flight 93 the only hijacked plane not to reach its target
    14·2 answers
  • Why is it useful to craft historical narratives
    8·1 answer
  • Why was is difficult for the Arab people to form one nation?
    7·1 answer
  • What methods did the colonists use to protest the stamp act?
    13·1 answer
  • Why did some people in China consider Mao Zedong a despot?
    10·2 answers
  • At what age was Lizzie when she was given to her masters son as a<br> wedding gift
    9·2 answers
  • What is one way in which the Supreme Court has power over the legislative branch's actions?
    13·1 answer
  • 1. Why did the demand for slaves increase during the cotton boom?
    12·1 answer
  • WHAT<br> is the “Course of human events?”<br><br> free brainlist
    12·2 answers
  • Mussolini allied with Hitler in the rome-Berlin blank while Japan and Germany signed the blank pact, promising a untitled front
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!