<span>Sounds like a very ambigous question and deserves an ambiguos answer. Art doesn't have to be inovative in my opinion it just has to make you think or show you a image of a earlier time. Actually it sounds like a stupid question to be inovative is to be more effecient or for something to function a better way. That's great if your talking about toasters but has no place in the art world unless your talking about water colors. Walt Whitman was a poet I guess you could considr him a literal artist but he's known as a poet.</span>
Hi There!
Question - Cryptology, the study and use of secret codes, has been an important component of US military strategy since it was first used in the American Revolution to hide sensitive communications from British forces.
How does the author introduce the reader to code talkers?
Answer - by presenting an interesting fact
Why - The reason I say its option A is because the fact that it makes the most sense in a way that, the other options don't make any sense. Option B says telling an entertaining story when its not a story. Option C makes no sense because the first sentence dosen't contain a quotation. Option D makes no sense because the first sentence dosen't ask a question.
Hope This Helps :)
Answer:
We stayed up late hoping to see lunar eclipse.
Explanation:
In sentence fragment there should be a subject, verb and complete sentence.
Green apples, which are best for baking, are sometimes baked into pies.
i don’t understand your question ?
