Answer:
The answer is (A)
<em>WAS</em><em> </em><em>THIS</em><em> </em><em>ANSWER</em><em> </em><em>HELPFUL</em><em>?</em><em> </em>
<em>MARK</em><em> </em><em>ME</em><em> </em><em>AS</em><em> </em><em>A</em><em> </em><em>BRAINLIEST</em>
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option D. Before government approves a merger, companies must prove that the merger would lower the number of competitors in the market. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.
The <u>c</u>ampaign objective which meets this business goal is Lead Generation
<h3>What is Lead Generation?</h3>
This refers to the process through which potential customers are identified and cultivated.
Hence, we can see that from the given scenario of the use of a database of customer information to identify their purchase decisions but has no metadata installed, this is lead generation.
Read more about Lead Generation here:
brainly.com/question/14972440
#SPJ12
Kinked demand
I hope that helped
Answer:
Yes, the contract is still valid.
Explanation:
Let us first clarify some terms first.
A contract is referred to as a legally binding agreement that is recognized, known and governs the rights and duties of the parties involved in an agreement. A contract is legally enforceable because it meets the features and approval of the law. An agreement basically involves the exchange of goods, transactions, services, money, or promises. In the case of breach of contract, the law awards the injured party access to legal remedies which include damages and cancellation.
Letter of revocation is an act by which a person having authority, calls back or in other words annuls a power, gift, or benefit, which had been bestowed upon another.
Yes, the contract still holds. This is due to the reason that the letter had a date mentioned on it which is August 4, a day before the contract was accepted even though the revocation letter arrived late.
Therefore, as regards to the date on the letter, the contract is still valid.
