Parallelism has the function of highlighting a concept within the text, to draw the reader's attention.
<h3>What is parallelism?</h3>
- It's a writing strategy.
- It consists of a sequence of words with the same grammatical structure that points to the same idea.
To find the effect of parallelism in the text, it is necessary to read the text and find a sequence of words with the same structure and context. Next, it is necessary to identify the elements of the text to which these words point.
You did not show the text this question refers to. This prevents me from being able to provide a specific answer, but I hope this answer can help you.
Learn more about parallelism at the link:
brainly.com/question/13999767
#SPJ1
We write and speak in three different 'persons' . . .
Let's say I'm telling you something about Sam.
I'm the first person. You're the second person. Sam is the third person.
First Person: I, we, us
Second Person: You, you-all
Third Person: He, she, it, they, them
So there are three different ways to write or tell the same story.
Most stories that you read are written either in the First person or the Third person.
<u>"First-person narrative" is a story being told by the person it's about</u>.
"I'm Al. I got up in the morning. Then I got dressed, I went to the store, and bought milk."
"Third-person narrative is a story being told about somebody.
"Sam got up in the morning. Then he got dressed, he went to the store, and he got milk."
I saved "Second-person narrative" for last, because it's not used very often
and so it sounds weird. But there ARE whole books written in Second-person:
"Your name is Johhny Schlaffgut. You went to bed early last night because
yesterday was a tough day at the office and you were tired. But this morning
you felt OK. You woke up, you got dressed, and you went to the store for milk."
Answer:
<em>Resolution:</em> Dorothy dumped a bucket of water onto the Witch and she melted. <u><em>Conflict:</em></u>The wizard turned out to be a fake and just a normal man so he couldn't grant magical wishes. Resolution: He was still able to give the scarecrow a brain, the Tin Woodman a heart and the cowardly lion courage without magic.
Explanation:
Answer:
B). Postman argues that television commercials do not use language or "tests of truth" to viewers decide whether to buy a product. Instead, they rely on images to create an emotional appeal that influences consumers' decisions.
Explanation:
The second option from the given options is not plagiarised as it paraphrases the ideas presented in the paragraph and acknowledges the author i.e. 'Neil Postman' when it says 'Postman argues.' It restates the meaning of the passage using different words that help in preventing plagiarism. The other options represent Postman's language as well as ideas without paraphrasing and acknowledgment or citation of the source that eventually plagiarizes them. Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
The U.S. Supreme Court expanded voting rights through Voting Rights Act interpretation. sorry if its late
Explanation:
