To ensure that the Aryan race was to become the master race and to ensure that the population was increased to fight for Germany in WW2
I believe the answer is: The laws and traditions lived on, flourishing through the Byzantines who lived in the East.
The Byzantinne was the once a part of The territory of the Roman empire on its eastern front. During the peak of it's glory, the Byzantinne empire adopt the majority of laws and tradition of the roman empire, which make many historians see them as a fragments of the roman empire.
Answer:
requiring citizens to obey all commands and laws imposed by the government without question
requiring citizens to set aside a portion of their property for the exclusive use of the government
Explanation:
In the 1800s, there was a school of thought then that focused on the reasoning of man and how logic and rationality is the driving force and main source of authority and clamored for ideals such as being tolerant, compassionate, obedience to constitutional authority within reason, et cetera. This movement was known as The Enlightenment.
Therefore, according to the principles of The Enlightenment, the following would be inappropriate requiring citizens to obey all commands and laws imposed by the government without question and requiring citizens to set aside a portion of their property for the exclusive use of the government because these actions are not rational.
Through much of the nineteenth century, Great Britain avoided the kind of social upheaval that intermittently plagued the Continent between 1815 and 1870. Supporters of Britain claimed that this success derived from a tradition of vibrant parliamentary democracy. While this claim holds some truth, the Great Reform Bill of 1832, the landmark legislation that began extending the franchise to more Englishmen, still left the vote to only twenty percent of the male population. A second reform bill passed in 1867 vertically expanded voting rights, but power remained in the hands of a minority--property-owning elites with a common background, a common education, and an essentially common outlook on domestic and foreign policy. The pace of reform in England outdistanced that of the rest of Europe, but for all that remained slow. Though the Liberals and Conservatives did advance different philosophy on the economy and government in its most basic sense, the common brotherhood on all representatives in parliament assured a relatively stable policy-making history.
Sorry it's so long but that's the answer toy your question...Hope this helps:)
