Firstly, we have to find out what 10% of $25000 is. To do this, multiply $25000 by 0.1 (10% in decimal form): 
. <em>$2500 is the 10% raise.</em>
Next, to find your first new salary, add $25000 and $2500 together: 
. <u>$27500 is your new salary after the 10% raise.</u>
Next, we need to find 10% of $27500. It's a similar process as to finding 10% of $25000. 
. <em>$2750 is your 10% cut.</em>
Next, since this is a cut, subtract $2750 from $27500. 
. <u>$24750 is your new salary after the 10% cut.</u>
Next, to find the percentage change, firstly divide $24750 by $25000. 
. Now this shows that your current salary is 99% of what you used to make. It is <em>not</em> how much less you make. To find how much less it is, subtract 99% from 100%: 
. <u>Your current salary is 1% less than what you used to make.</u>
Answer:
The other factor is 5x-2
Step-by-step explanation:
Using the factorisation method:
Two numbers that multiply to give -10 and add to give +3:
+5 and -2
So the other factor is 5x-2
I'm not sure about the second part of the question but I hope you understood how to deal with the first part.
Answer:
Y=8x
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
THe answer is C
Answer:
Check Explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Confidence Interval for the population mean is basically an interval of range of values where the true population mean can be found with a certain level of confidence.
Mathematically,
Confidence Interval = (Sample mean) ± (Margin of error)
With p(japan) representing the true population proportion of US automobile that are made in Japan, the computer output 90% confidence
0.29938661 < p(japan) < 0.46984416
mean that p(japan); the true population proportion of US automobile that are made in Japan lies within the range of proportions (0.29938661, 0.46984416) with an assurance level of 90%.
b) 90% confidence mean that the true proportion may or may not be in the given range, but we are 90% certain that it does.
c) The confidence interval contradicts the politician's claim that "Half of all cars in the United States are made in Japan" because the proportion in the politician's claim, (0.50), does not lie within the range of values that our confidence interval says the true population proportion can take on; (0.29938661, 0.46984416).
0.50 lies outside of the confidence interval obtained for the true population proportion of US automobiles that are made in Japan, hence, the confidence interval contradicts the politician's claim.
Hope this Helps!!!
