Answer: I would support this endeavor, because we are running out of resources on Earth. Colonizing Mars would also open up new jobs on and off Earth. Some would argue that we could better spend that money on helping save our planet rather the colonizing a new one. I would have to say good luck, getting the oil executives and other current un-renewable energy executives to sign up for that one. It would take hundreds of years and more money to switch from where we are now to completely renewable. Also the benefits of the scientific boom from that kind of money being put into those programs would be enormous, and not just in the space exploration. It would also help just about every other scientific field as well.
Explanation:
Yes he used his own bible.
Wait it isn't 5! Just a second. It is -15
-4 times 5 is negative 20. When you add 5 to negative 20, it becomes -15
Answer:
B. A genocide.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
A. A success for Christianity and European civilization.
B. A genocide.
C. An economic revival of the New World and Europe.
D. A naval and imperial resurgence in Europe.
A genocide refers to the systematic killing of a particular social group. This generally responds to characteristics such as race, ethnicity, religion or political ideologies. In this case, the voyages of Columbus can be described as having led to a genocide because they led to the systematic killing of the indigenous population of the Americas. While some cultural groups were able to survive until the present (with greatly diminished power and numbers), many disappeared completely.
Answer: Operation Desert Storm: Persian Gulf War
Kurdish Genocide: Iraq-Iraq War
Explanation:
Violation of sanction: 2003 Iraq War
Hope this helps!
Can I have brainliest if correct?
