Similarities russia and britain industrial revolution

History

2 answers:

Juliette [100K]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

The Industrial Revolution hit the Russian Empire later than most other European and Western nations. The emancipation of the serfs in 1861 aided Russia in its transition from a predominantly agricultural society to a more industrialized society. The newly feed commoners looked toward the cities for jobs.

Explanation:

Elza [17]2 years ago

3 0

Answer: The Industrial Revolution hit the Russian Empire later than most other European and Western nations. The emancipation of the serfs in 1861 aided Russia in its transition from a predominantly agricultural society to a more industrialized society. The newly feed commoners looked toward the cities for jobs.

Explanation:

Russian industrialization was motivated by capitalism, while mercantilism was the philosophy that guided British industrialization. ... Russia closely guarded its industrial knowledge and technology, while Great Britain worked to spread industrial ideas around the world.

You might be interested in

Why did irish workers start building the railroads from the west ?

balu736 [363]

Answer:

Probably to have better ability to travel one place to another.

3 0

3 years ago

In 1774 the First Continental Congress sent a document, the Declaration and Resolves, to the British government. In it Congress

Arte-miy333 [17]

To represent themself

6 0

3 years ago

During the golden age, how did the US congress act to regulate business practices

Yanka [14]

The answer to your question would most likely be C. Mainly because, the US Congress act to regulate business practices is when Congress passed laws that ensured workplace safety.

4 0

3 years ago

Proponents of increase powers for state government in relation to the federal government would most likely look to which of the

Viefleur [7K]

Answer:

c or d im sorry if it's wrong.

8 0

2 years ago

What effect would you expect the 1964 Supreme Court case, Wesberry v. Sanders, to have on the likelihood of a group of small rur

Anna007 [38]

Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964), was a U.S. Supreme Court case involving U.S. Congressional districts in the state of Georgia. The Court issued its ruling on February 17, 1964. This decision requires each state to draw its U.S. Congressional districts so that they are approximately equal in population.

Nationally, this decision effectively reduced the representation of rural districts in the U.S. Congress. Particularly, the Court held that the population differences among Georgia's congressional districts were so great as to violate the Constitution.

In reaching this landmark decision, the Supreme Court asserted that Article I, Section 2 of the United States Constitutionrequires that representatives shall be chosen "by the People of the several States" and shall be "apportioned among the several States...according to their respective Numbers...." These words, the Court held, mean that "as nearly as practicable one man's vote in a congressional election is to be worth as much as another's."

Wesberry and the Court's later "one person, one vote" decisions had an extraordinary impact on the makeup of the House, on the content of public policy, and on electoral politics in general. However, these "one person, one vote" rules do not prevent and have not prevented gerrymandering.

A related case, Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533 (1964), held that seats in both houses of a bicameral state legislaturemust also, to satisfy the Equal Protection Clause, represent districts as equal in population as practicably possible. The federal Senate was unaffected since the Constitution explicitly grants each state two senators.

4 0

3 years ago