1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vsevolod [243]
2 years ago
9

A lot is 60 m by 36 m. A house 28 m by 8 m is built on the lot. How much area is left​ over?

Mathematics
1 answer:
Kay [80]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

1936 m2

Lot = 60 x 36 = 2160m^2

House = 28 x 8 = 224m^2

Area not covered by the house = 2160^2 - 224^2

= 1936m^2

Hope this helps !!

You might be interested in
Plz Answer this question fast, Thank You
AysviL [449]

Answer:

162

Step-by-step explanation:

20736 x 729 x 4/216 x 64 x27

Now go ahead and do the cancellations

20736/216 =96

729/27 =27

64/4 =16

so you end up getting 96 x 27 x1 /26

96/16 =6

so you get 27 x 6 =162

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Dose 8 has more factors or 9
Doss [256]

Answer:

Factors for 8: 1, 2, 4, 8

Factors for 9: 1, 3, 9

So 8 has more factors

7 0
2 years ago
Linear Algebra question! Please help!
kozerog [31]

Answers:

  1. false
  2. false
  3. true
  4. false
  5. True

==================================================

Explanation:

Problem 1

This is false because the A and B should swap places. It should be (AB)^{-1} = B^{-1}A^{-1}.

The short proof is to multiply AB with its inverse (AB)^{-1}  and we get: (AB)*(AB)^{-1} = (AB)*(B^{-1}A^{-1}) = A(B*B^{-1})*A^{-1} = A*A^{-1} = I

The fact we get the identity matrix proves that we have the proper order at this point. The swap happens so that B matches up its corresponding inverse B^{-1} and the two cancel each other out.

Keep in mind matrix multiplication is <u>not</u> commutative. So AB is not the same as BA.

-------------------------

Problem 2

This statement is true if and only if AB = BA

(A+B)^2 = (A+B)(A+B)

(A+B)^2 = A(A+B) + B(A+B)

(A+B)^2 = A^2 + AB + BA + B^2

(A+B)^2 = A^2 + 2AB + B^2 ... only works if AB = BA

However, in most general settings, matrix multiplication is <u>not</u> commutative. The order is important when multiplying most two matrices. Only for special circumstances is when AB = BA going to happen. In general,  AB = BA is false which is why statement two breaks down and is false in general.

-------------------------

Problem 3

This statement is true.

If A and B are invertible, then so is AB.

This is because both A^{-1} and B^{-1} are known to exist (otherwise A and B wouldn't be invertible) and we can use the rule mentioned in problem 1. Make sure to swap the terms of course.

Or you can use a determinant argument to prove the claim

det(A*B) = det(A)*det(B)

Since A and B are invertible, their determinants det(A) and det(B) are nonzero which makes the right hand side nonzero. Therefore det(A*B) is nonzero and AB has an inverse.

So if we have two invertible matrices, then their product is also invertible. This idea can be scaled up to include things like A^4*B^3 being also invertible.

If you wanted, you can carefully go through it like this:

  1. If A and B are invertible, then so is AB
  2. If A and AB are invertible, then so is A*AB = A^2B
  3. If A and A^2B are invertible, then so is A*A^2B = A^3B

and so on until you build up to A^4*B^3. Therefore, we can conclude that A^m*B^n is also invertible. Be careful about the order of multiplying the matrices. Something like A*AB is different from AB*A, the first of which is useful while the second is not.

So this is why statement 3 is true.

-------------------------

Problem 4

This is false. Possibly a quick counter-example is to consider these two matrices

A = \begin{bmatrix}1 & 0\\0 & 1\end{bmatrix} \text{ and } B = \begin{bmatrix}-1 & 0\\0 & -1\end{bmatrix}

both of which are invertible since their determinant is nonzero (recall the determinant of a diagonal matrix is simply the product along the diagonal entries). So it's not too hard to show that the determinant of each is 1, and each matrix shown is invertible.

However, adding those two mentioned matrices gets us the 2x2 zero matrix, which is a matrix of nothing but zeros. Clearly the zero matrix has determinant zero and is therefore not invertible.

There are some cases when A+B may be invertible, but it's not true in general.

-------------------------

Problem 5

This is true because each A pairs up with an A^{-1} to cancel out (similar what happened with problem 1). For more info, check out the concept of diagonalization.

5 0
2 years ago
Can anyone slove this question pls ​
skad [1K]

we have: -10/4 = -2.5 ⇒ -2 > -2.5 > -3

ANSWER : -2 and -3

ok done. Thank to me :>

4 0
2 years ago
Can someone help me with question 6 please
SIZIF [17.4K]
A) 4a+3w
b) 2b+h
c) 3(w+h)
d) (4a+3w)(2b+h) - 3(w+h)
just expand brackets for d and simplify
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Calculate the volume of the cylinder.<br><br> 4cm<br> 10 cm<br> Use<br> h = 3. 14.
    15·1 answer
  • What is the surface area?
    10·2 answers
  • Which equation is a related equation? x + 15 =24
    12·2 answers
  • If G(x) =1/x were shifted 2 units to the left and 2 units up, what would the new equation be? A. G(x)=1/x-4 B. G(x)=1/(x-2)+2 C.
    5·2 answers
  • What is the answer too n+ 2 = -14-n ?
    5·1 answer
  • Which fraction is equivalent to 0.3636?
    8·2 answers
  • Solve for p. <br> P=?<br> 12 = p<br> 11 12
    13·1 answer
  • Eddie is practicing wind sprints during his summer break. He’s able to run 72 meters in 12 seconds. If d represents distance and
    6·1 answer
  • Exponents of the multiple 3
    8·1 answer
  • Question 5 (1 point)
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!