1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elodia [21]
2 years ago
8

What was happening in the 1960's that changed Policing?

Law
1 answer:
puteri [66]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The 1960s were a period characterized by much civil unrest. Citizens ... the hiring of more minority officers and that police practices be changed significantly.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
2. What happened to savings in the United States? How did consumers contribute to this change?
Rina8888 [55]

Answer:

What happened to savings in the United States?

Explanation:

The saving rate went from 10% savings rate to a negative savings rate. Consumers did this by binged buying items. Consumers would buy so many things that that weren't necessary, consumers supersized everything they had, instead of saving.

4 0
3 years ago
Can primary and/or secondary authority materials also be used as finding tools?
rodikova [14]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

I could be wrong

5 0
3 years ago
What is your opinion on having cameras in courtrooms?
egoroff_w [7]

Explanation:

i think that it would be good because it has proof of what wveryone says so they cant say that tgey said something different or that they didnt plead guilty

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the obligations of the constitution to you ?
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

It is a responsibility to obey the law.

Explanation:

The Constitution assumes some civil duties, and these are inherent in the Constitution. For example, the Constitution presumes lawfulness. It is a responsibility, then, to obey the law.

6 0
2 years ago
What are three historic landmark cases decided by the Supreme Court? Please name each case and briefly state the topic it dealt
kotegsom [21]

Answer:

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Issue: Who can ultimately decide what the law is?

Result: "It is explicitly the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is."

Importance: This decision gave the Court the ability to strike down laws on the grounds that they are unconstitutional (a power called judicial review).

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

Issue: Can Congress establish a national bank, and if so, can a state tax this bank?

Result: The Court held that Congress had implied powers to establish a national bank under the "necessary and proper" clause of the U.S. Constitution. The Court also determined that United States laws trump state laws and consequently, a state could not tax the national bank.

Importance: The McCulloch decision established two important principles for constitutional law that continue today: implied powers and federal supremacy

ABA Groups Division for Public Education Programs Constitution Day

Landmark United States Supreme Court Cases

Share:

    

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

Issue: Who can ultimately decide what the law is?

Result: "It is explicitly the province and duty of the Judicial Department to say what the law is."

Importance: This decision gave the Court the ability to strike down laws on the grounds that they are unconstitutional (a power called judicial review).

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

Issue: Can Congress establish a national bank, and if so, can a state tax this bank?

Result: The Court held that Congress had implied powers to establish a national bank under the "necessary and proper" clause of the U.S. Constitution. The Court also determined that United States laws trump state laws and consequently, a state could not tax the national bank.

Importance: The McCulloch decision established two important principles for constitutional law that continue today: implied powers and federal supremacy.

Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)

Issue: Can states pass laws that challenge the power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce?

Result: The Court held that it is the role of the federal government to regulate commerce and that state governments cannot develop their own commerce-regulating laws. Further, the Court created a wide definition for “commerce,” reasoning that the term encompassed more than just selling and buying. In this case, the Court determined that regulating water navigation was in fact an act that regulated commerce.

Importance: The impact of Gibbons is still felt today as it gives the federal government a much-broader base to regulate economic transactions.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 7. When driving, being appropriately dressed for the current weather environment is also very important to the task of driving.
    15·2 answers
  • What refers to any instrument or weapon used in a death, such as a knife or firearm?
    13·1 answer
  • _________ sentencing involves a judge increasing sanctions and conditions imposed on an offender
    5·1 answer
  • What are some potential problems or risks of relying on the information provided by anonymous 9-1-1 callers to serve as proof of
    14·1 answer
  • The FBI believes they have found a source of money laundering for a crime syndicate. They suspect that documents are being held
    15·2 answers
  • Tyler, a citizen of Utah, files a lawsuit in federal court against MegaCorp. Tyler's claim is based upon a violation of federal
    5·1 answer
  • Nhà nước Cộng hoà xã hội chủ nghĩa Việt Nam không mang bản chất tính giai cấp đúng hay sai
    6·1 answer
  • Is the power of a court to inquire into facts, apply the law, make decisions, and declare judgment in any matter.
    10·2 answers
  • The parole officer has more contact and responsibility to the judge than the probation officer does.
    13·1 answer
  • When reviewing a lower court decision, an appellate court will:1) review the transcripts of the lower court.2) read briefs from
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!