Answer:
no
Explanation:
The president should be able to do that because if he didn't our world today would be so messed up. We wouldn't have any laws. Also that is not too much power.
In court cases, the Plaintiff is the party that brings charges and the Defendant is the party accused of a violation of the law. This is further explained below.
<h3>Who is
Defendant?</h3>
Generally, Defendant is simply defined as the person or persons charged with a crime or violation of a legal code.
In conclusion, Defendants are accused of breaking the law, whereas Plaintiffs are the ones who file the accusations against them.
Read more about Defendant
brainly.com/question/12441773
#SPJ1
Most likely taxes because all the other answers are things that people desire for/of their government, although economics could also be a potential answer, but I’m leaning towards taxes
1) a situation in which human wants are greater than the capacity of available resources to provide for those wants
2)a situation in which a resource has more than one valuable use
Answer:
See explaination
Explanation:
1. The Defensible Space Theory can really be seen as a logical explanation for controlling crime from the perspectives of a defender as well as an attacker. This theory makes use of the science of psychology with the science of meaningful space. When the defender, that is, the home owners will be responsible for their home space, the sense of responsibility will be higher on the same. The home owners will be accountable for their defense. This encourages home owners to design their home space in such a way that they will be able to control their environment based on their present capabilities like family structure, income level, and socioeconomic status. The attacker, that is, the potential criminal will feel insecure and uncomfortable on a highly defended land. So, the probability of the criminal attacking the home space or neighborhood may be lessened. This argument is supported by the study which involved private homes in two high-crime areas in St. Louis. These areas recorded lower crimes than public areas using the Defensible Space Theory.
2. According to the Routine Activity Theory, the condition for crime is the presence of a suitable target(s) and the absence of a guardian(s). It is important to note that something or the other will always be present to motivate potential offenders to commit crime. So, there will always be motivated offenders. If motivated offenders are present, so suitable targets will be present in the society on the other side for crime to take place. So, suitable targets cannot be left unguarded which will increase the probability of crime, considering the target is in an isolated position. Even a weak guardian is sometimes equivalent to no guardian or protector. So, I think, presence of guardian(s), more specifically, more capable guardian(s) plays the greatest role at reducing
