Yes. The two theorems are equivalent statements given that the fundamental theorem of calculus is true.
That is the definition of a irrational number, A rational number must be able to be written as a ratio of 2 integers. The denominator cannot be 0, because that would make the number undefined
The solution is the coordinates of the point of intersection
That is (3 , 1)
Its the last choice.
Answer: √5
2.7 is a rational number because it's a terminating decimal which means that the decimal does end and all terminating decimals are rational numbers.
-3 is a rational number because it's an
integer and all integers are rational.
√4 is rational because it's a perfect square which means that a number can be multiplied by itself to get 4 and that number is 2.
√5 is no rational! It's impossible to find a whole number multiplied by itself to give us 5 which means that it's
non-terminating and non-repeating.
