1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
liraira [26]
3 years ago
10

Following the 1963 Supreme Court decision in Gideon v. Wainright, all states began to provide legal representation to defendants

in criminal cases that cannot afford to pay for their own lawyer. What basic freedom is this meant to protect, and how does it affect individuals who are defendants in criminal cases?
Select one:
A. The protection against self-incrimination; it informs a defendant that they do not have bear witness against themselves.
B. The right to freedom of assembly; it allows a defendant to assemble a legal team to represent himself.
C. The right to freedom of speech; it allows a defendant to be able to represent themselves in a court of law.
D. The right to a lawyer; it allows a defendant to always be able to defend themselves in a criminal case.
History
1 answer:
Anna11 [10]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

D. The right to a lawyer; it allows a defendant to always be able to defend themselves in a criminal case.

Explanation:

The famous Supreme Court case Gideon v. Wainright in 1963 was a case regarding a convict Clarence Earl Gideon, who had no legal representation and his pleas to be given a lawyer by the government. The ruling was in favor of Gideon and asked the state to provide a lawyer for the defendant.

According to the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution, every citizen has the right to equal protection under the law. And the 6th Amendment also states that criminal defendants have the right to get representation even if they cannot afford one. So, in respect to these two amendments, the<u> Gideon v. Wainright case touched both issues and thus, gave the defendant the right to be represented by a lawyer and also be given the chance to defend himself in any criminal case.</u>

Thus, the correct answer is option D.

You might be interested in
Evaluate the extent to which regional differences about slavery contributed to political tensions in the period from 1830 to 186
Maurinko [17]

Answer:

All northern states had abolished slavery by 1830, however, in the South, slavery was more important and widespread than ever. The economy of the South depended on the slave labor working in cotton plantations.

Explanation:

This led to bitter disagreements between the North and the South about slavery. Some compromises were reached but the tensions continued.

The most important was the Missouri Compromise, which allowed Missouri to enter the union as a slavery state in exchange for the entrance of Maine as a free state. Besides, the Missouri Compromise prohibited slavery above the 36° parallel in the new territories. If this held true today, Arizona, New Mexico, and Southern California would be slave states.

Abraham Lincoln and the new Republican Party opposed slavery in all new U.S. territories, whether they were below the 36° parallel or not. When Lincoln was elected president, the South saw him as a threat for slavery in the South even if Lincoln neven explicitely said that he wanted to abolish slavery in all U.S. states.

This led to the secession of several southern states, the creation of the Confederacy, and finally, the Civil War.

6 0
3 years ago
The two Chinese groups that fought one another before the invasion of Manchuria were the
Mars2501 [29]
KMT - Kuo Mintang government forces
CPC - Communist Party of China
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following best explains the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Bush v. Gore?
Marina CMI [18]
The statement that best explains the U.S Supreme Court decision in Bush v. Gore is it decided that the Florida Supreme Court decision to hold a new recount was unconstitutional and Bush was the winner. The correct answer is B. 
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A right is unenumerated if it is listed in the Constitution. interpreted by the Supreme Court. assumed to be a fundamental right
Rudiy27

Answer:

HEllo. i dont know

Explanation:

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What era was Marbury vs Madison in?
Hoochie [10]
They are in the era of the 1800's.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • - Why did President Herbert Hoover authorize the<br> Mexican Repatriation Act?
    6·1 answer
  • In a country where the gap between rich and poor widens, the government often ?
    7·1 answer
  • What was the Japanese code for maximum success in surprising the US.
    8·1 answer
  • Two reasons why people supported the expansion of the United States’ territory?
    12·1 answer
  • In 1979, the National Commission for the protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research developed ethical pr
    5·1 answer
  • Who was julius’ ceasers adopted son who ruled half the Roman Empire?
    12·1 answer
  • Who was marco polo and why was he important quizlet
    9·1 answer
  • Which philosopher believed that art was a representation of representation Aristotle,Plato,frued, or Dostoevsky
    7·1 answer
  • .............................................................................
    10·1 answer
  • In the early 1300s, the Mali Empire became famous as a trading center and as a/an _____. Select one:
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!