Answer:
Herstatt.
Explanation:
The risk that a central bank will not make the necessary transfer of foreign currency to complete a currency settlement is known as herstatt risk.
Herstatt risk is also known as cross-settlement risk or settlement risk. It was named after Bankaus Herstatt (a German bank) that failed in June 1974 when it was supposed to settle a contract for a payment received from the other party and consequently, amounting to a loss of about $602,000,000.
Hence, is mainly a loss in foreign exchange transactions where a party defaults after receiving money from another.
I would think the answer D cause they both have good plans
Answer: (C) The production of non durable consumer goods is more stable than the production of durable consumer goods over the business cycle.
Explanation:
The consumer durability of the goods has the significant life span and the production of the non durable goods of the consumer are basically purchased for the immediate consumption over the business cycle so that is why it is more stable as compared to the production of the durable goods.
The example of the durable consumer goods are smartphones, furniture and the other household appliances. On the other hand, the non durable consumer goods are more stable as it contain daily use material like food, clothes and beverages.
Answer:
$41,500
Explanation:
Calculation to determine What was the initial cost of the machine to be capitalized
Purchase price $35,000
Add Freight $1,500
Add Installation $3,000
Add Testing $2,000
Total Cost $41,500
Therefore the initial cost of the machine is $41,500
Answer: The Break-Even Point will reduce from $4,285.71 to $4,125
Explanation:
To get the Break-Even Point we can divide Fixed Assets by the Contribution margin.
The Contribution Margin is the Selling Price minus the Variable Cost.
For Scenario 1 the Break-Even Point will be,
= 15,000 / ( 6 - 2.50)
= $4,285.71
For Scenario 2 the Break-Even Point is,
= 16,500 / 6.5 -2.5
= $4,125
The Break-Even Point for Scenario 2 means that even though the higher Fixed Costs could have led to a higher Break-Even Point, the higher price contributed more than the fixed costs did and led to an ultimately lower Break-Even Point than the first Scenario.
