Answer:
raising awareness programmes,keeping environment clean,being attentive in social activities ,etc.
The brain is incorrect. Its the nucleus (the brain is an organ not a organelle)
hope that helps :)
<span>developing a technique for observing an object that has yet to be observed
</span><span>Thus, to achieve the creative approach above the researchers must utilize and apply the </span>scientific method in gathering, interpreting and analyzing empirical evidence<span>. </span>
<span>Empirical evidence, data or knowledge is an obtained set of facts or figures or existing and presenting data that was yielded during the process of experimentation or scientific discovery. These empirical data or evidence is further studied and investigated by the scientist in a formal scientific approach which follows the steps of observation, making a hypothesis, gathering data, interpreting data and evaluating the data. These steps of the scientific approach are vital in the course to explain and discuss the result and evidence obtained during the process. </span>
Answer:
The correct answer is option E. a flavivirus.
Explanation:
A flavivirus is a virus that is found in primarily by mosquitoes and tick or other arthropods. These are the virus that contains single-stranded enveloped RNA. These mosquitoes or ticks can infect humans with these flaviviruses. These viruses cause diseases that are characterized by high fever, rashes.
The epidemic can cause life-threatening diseases such as dengue, yellow fever, tick-borne encephalitis.
Thus, the correct answer is option E. a flavivirus.
Answer:
The ethics of artificially inserting traits in animals has been in the practice for years in the form of selective breeding, but should scientists really be editing DNA to the extent they are today? I don't believe they should. Life itself should construct itself without us interfering. Making a brand new plant just because it looks nice doesn't account for many factors, including the fact that it could be harmful to nearby plants if pollinated. In addition, generic engineering costs quite a lot of money, which should be used on other more cost effective methods, such as improving agriculture rather than creating a whole new plant that could harm entire crops. Genetic engineering isn't a necessity and humans should not play God with plant and animal life.