Answer:
Higgs's argument is stronger because Folsom's primary arguments involved quotes. Quotes can be unreliable, especially if chosen with bias from a selected group of people. Beyond that, quotes from people that lived in the moment are often short-sighted and don't understand long term effects. While Folsom does also source historians, he focuses a lot on Roosevelt's interest spending and believes that the money that went back to the American people actually prolonged suffering. Higgs, however, focuses on the short and long-term effects of the New Deal and uses a lot of data to prove his point. While he does have quotes, he doesn't rely on them to make or break his argument, unlike Folsom. Higgs is also able to understand some of the negatives of the New Deal, unlike Folsom who did not pay any attention to the other side of the issue.
Explanation:
This is for part two of the question.
I think the answer is A
Hope it helps
Are there any options for this? The answer should be "events that have not occurred" hope that helps
Answer:
English Common Laws => basis of U.S. laws
Salutary Neglect => free market economy
Separation of Powers => three branches of government
"<span>d. The expedition did not conduct trade along the way" would be an accurate statement regarding Magellan's expedition, since this expedition was purely exploratory in nature. </span>
