Formally know as Siam the kingdom of Thailand was the only southeast part not under Europes rule
Answer:
One of the saddest facts about World War I is that millions died needlessly because military and civilian leaders were slow to adapt their old-fashioned strategies and tactics to the new weapons of 1914. New technology made war more horrible and more complex than ever before. The United States and other countries felt the effects of the war for years afterwards.
The popular image of World War I is soldiers in muddy trenches and dugouts, living miserably until the next attack. This is basically correct. Technological developments in engineering, metallurgy, chemistry, and optics had produced weapons deadlier than anything known before. The power of defensive weapons made winning the war on the western front all but impossible for either side.
The Germans put their faith in Hitler because they were in a massive depression from the first world war. They were looking for someone to lead and get them back on their feet. Hitler even gave them people to blame and he promised he would bring about change
The way that the Articles of Confederation and the US Constitution are similar is <u>D. Both</u> allow the federal government to coin money.
<h3>What are the similarities between the Articles of Confederation and the US Constitution?</h3>
The Articles of Confederation and the US Constitution are similar in the following ways:
- Obedience to documents
- The central government is in charge of the value of money
- Recognition of the nation as the United States of America
- Congress has legislative power.
But there were many differences.
Thus, based on the options, the similarity between the Articles of Confederation and the US Constitution is <u>Option D</u>.
Learn more about the Articles of Confederation and the US Constitution at brainly.com/question/27826616
#SPJ1
The correct answer is that each case resulted in the Federal government getting more power, in one way or another.
In Marbury v. Madison, the Judicial Branch elbowed its way into establishing the ability to review laws to determine their constitutionality.
In McCulloch v. Maryland, Congress got more power when the Supreme Court ruled that it had implied powers.
In Gibbons v. Ogden, the Supreme Court ruled that states can't get in the way of Congress acting in their role of arbiter of interstate commerce.
