Answer:
Jacqueline Woodson tells her memoir “Brown Girl Dreaming” from the first-person, limited-omniscient, present-tense point of view of herself as a child. She does this for several reasons. First and foremost, the memoir being told is Jacqueline’s, and there is no better person to tell her childhood story than herself. Second, this allows Jacqueline to communicate intimate thoughts, ideas, and feelings with the reader directly, allowing them to see and feel things as she did. It also allows readers a sort of intimacy as if the story was being told by one friend to another. The limited-omniscient aspect lends itself to Jacqueline telling the story as her child-self in present-tense, and not knowing everything going on in the world around her, but having vague ideas or inclinations about events and circumstances beyond her control.
Explanation:
The answer to this question is:
<span>Why must every proposition in an argument be tested using a logical sequence?
</span>"to discover if it makes logical sense"
Hoped This Helped, <span>
Calderonsairasov445o
Your Welcome :) </span>
Answer:
It depends on the matter, such as how Susan B Anthony broke the law of being a woman voting in my eyes such thing is silly to be a law and to be arrested for, other matters such as murder, theft, and plenty of other things should never be okay to break the law for. I would only break the law over things I feel is ridiculous and it should be done such as what Susan did when she voted, I would've also voted as a woman because she did nothing wrong in my opinion. I may not have much personal experience so let's instead look at Rosa Parks who was arrested because she wouldn't give her seat up to a white person, heck I most certainly would not have to, when Rosa broke that "law" of not getting off her seat for the white person she did nothing wrong in that act but was still arrested for it and again in my eyes she did not do anything wrong by breaking that law.
Explanation:
Hope this helps i wrote it off the top of my head :) stay safe!!
Answer:
How long has the project been going *
Explanation:
Can i have brainly please lol ? Lol
Based on the texts provided, which statement is accurate?
A)
Governor Faubus was angered by Draper's novel
because of its negative portrayal of him.
The actions of the governor in Draper's story are
based on the historical record of the actions of
Governor Faubus.
Draper set her novel in 1957 in Arkansas, but the
governor in her story does not share the same
opinions or take the same actions as the historical
Governor Faubus.
Draper gives the governor in her story a different
name and physical description, but that character
shares the same opinions or take the same actions as
the historical Governor Faubus.
Sentence 3
