Answer:
c) it appears to be sound because the data are not biased in anyway.
Step-by-step explanation:
From the information given regarding the sample selection method , the size, the larger sample from which the survey subject were selected, we can conclude that the data is sound and not in anyway biased. The subject were selected from a reputable market research firm, which means the subjects were chosen from a larger sample which is reliable and not just a voluntary pool of subjects. Also, the selection process is randomized. Based on these, there are no flaws which are likely to cause the introduction of bias into the sample selected. Hence, the data is sound and not in any way biased.
The wording of this question is a bit confusing... You can't write a sequence in sigma notation, but rather a series or sum. I think the question is asking you to write the sum of the sequence,

which would be

in sigma notation.
To do this, notice that the denominator in each term is a power of 2, starting with
and ending with
. So in sigma notation, this series is

Answer:
y=2/1x
Step-by-step explanation:
Subtract (6,8) by (1, -2)
8--2/6-1=10/5
Simply
10/5=2
Plug in
y=2x
To convert the improper fraction

into a mixed number, you first want to
divide the numerator (1000)
by the denominator (859)
:

The
quotient, which is 1, will be your whole number part of your mixed number. The
remainder, 141, will become the numerator of the fraction part of your mixed number. The
original denominator of your improper fraction, 859, is still the denominator of your mixed number. So your mixed number form of your improper fraction is:
Your answer is 
The answer is C. 423.52 m