Many factors including farming method, where food is grown, what pesticides and fertilisers are used, what is fed to our livestock, and so on, affect the environmental impact of the food we buy and eat. ... Water and air pollution, loss of wildlife, and of natural habitats all result from food production.
<span>Since a peasant owns little property and works in the employ of a landowner or business owner, he or she would have little concern for the loss of property and be less concerned if the flow of products is disrupted. He or she would also have more incentive to invest in a revolution that upended the status quo and allowed for more mobility within the social and economic hierarchies. The merchant would be invested in quelling any rebellion that would interrupt the economy and cause destruction of property and good.</span>
The correct answer is C) reduce the economic hegemony of the global north.
The emergence of the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) countries has the potential to most likely reduce the economic hegemony of the global north.
For many years the northern hemisphere nations such as Western Europe, the United States, and Canada have dominated trade and the economic world in general.
However, experts have considered that the advent of the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) can represent an important block to seriously compete with those northern hemisphere powers due to the size of their markets and cheap labor.
Although those BRICS countries have interesting numbers in Macroeconomy, they still have very poor people that in Microeconomics that contrasts the Macroeconomy scenario.
I think tropical rainforests I could be wrong
