1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
navik [9.2K]
2 years ago
12

Gregg v. Georgia (1976) made the death penalty legal in the United States, as long as certain conditions are met. true or false

Law
1 answer:
Bond [772]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

the statement is true

Explanation:

death penalty has certain regulations in each state

You might be interested in
Which of the following is NOT a reason for implementing Intermediate Sanctions?
tensa zangetsu [6.8K]

Answer: Lack of evidence that the offender was actually guilty

Explanation:

Intermediate sanctions do not involve the person going to prison but they are quite intrusive as they include (but are not limited to): intensive supervision and electronic monitoring. Most people believe they should be used as punishment for nonviolent <u>crime</u>.

The keyword above is ''crime''. If there is a lack of evidence that a person committed a crime then they are presumed innocent which means they did not commit the crime in question and so do not qualify for intermediate sanctions.

3 0
2 years ago
1. The sale of the property in Westfield's case was held not to be ordinary income
Lynna [10]

Answer:

wri"ng books and selling his copyright. (f) Pro't ... ( e) Again, this ful'ls the prerequisites as it is cash and a real gain (see ... This would be the case even if the payments were not regular as regularity .

6 0
2 years ago
What do intellectual property rights aim to do?
Georgia [21]
I believe it’s A or B I’m leaning towards A but I’ll look up the definition definition: “intellectual property rights are the rights given to people over the the creations of their minds. They usually give the creator an exclusive right over the use of his/her creation for a certain period of time” so The answer is
ANSWER- B
5 0
2 years ago
3. Why was MoCulloch y, Maryland a landmark federalism casa?
Anvisha [2.4K]

i think the answer is C since it makes sense too the answer unlike the others

5 0
3 years ago
In a lawsuit between Cloud Computing Corporation and Digital Enterprises, Inc., the court applies the doctrine of stare decisis.
cestrela7 [59]

Answer:

The doctrine of stare decisis is a legal doctrine that mandates the courts to follow historical cases when making a ruling on a similar case.

The doctrine has a lot in common with the american legal system because the American legal system follows a case step by step before making conclusions.

Explanation:

Stare decisis ensures that cases with similar scenarios and facts are approached in the same way. it binds the courts to follow legal steps set by previous decisions.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which is an example of a local government enforcing a national law?
    13·2 answers
  • Do you think it’s fair that some first-time offenders have to serve jail time while others are allowed to enroll in diversion pr
    11·2 answers
  • Continue to drink or use other drugs and drive but be more careful
    11·2 answers
  • Why did proving American Indian heritage become important?<br> Select all that apply
    9·1 answer
  • What is the author's argument? A) Youth voting makes sense to the author. B) Everyone wants their voice and opinion to count. C)
    15·1 answer
  • Assume that you are planning to start your own day care center. You will need to consider many aspects, such as legal, technical
    5·2 answers
  • What causes the object that moves along a surface to slow down and eventually stop​
    10·1 answer
  • Samoan's 57 year old husband Charles died in 2017 she has not remarried Simon's mother Lucy lives in a nursing home lucy's only
    11·1 answer
  • Attacking team kicks the ball over the end line without it touching any players from the defending team, the defending team is a
    13·1 answer
  • it is easier to incriminate a young person for infringing on copyright rules under the dmca than to incriminate an older person.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!