Answer:
Framing.
Explanation:
The case of framing a death penalty convict is a frequent dilemma that surrounds most cases among capital punishment criminals. Due to the increased media coverage, there can arise many more sides of the story, leading to more speculation of whether the person is guilty or not.
The media coverage leads to a massive support system for the convicts and presents an increase in the awareness of the case and the possibility of convicting the wrong man. The chance that an innocent man may be executed by a wrongful accusation has led to massive public awareness ad influence the public's opinion, thereby leading to increased speculation of wrongly executing an innocent man. This then leads to <u>an innocent man being "framed" or made to appear guilty for the government had already made a mistake and it is easier to frame him rather than admit their mistake in public. </u>
I don't know limited and unlimited countries, but this is something that you often say of government: a limited government must obey some kind of rule, while an unlimited government is an absolute government and is free to do everything (including kill its subjects)
<span />
The answer is "<span>Culture of increasing customer value seems to be a sustained advantage".
</span>
Zappos intentionally makes and fortifies its corporate culture. The workplace accommodated representatives won't draw in each activity searcher and it's not for each worker. In any case, the general population who fit the corporate culture flourish working for Zappos.
Yes there is, thank you for asking us here at brainly. feel free to ask us more questions!
