Answer:
I believe the answer would be 2.added New Mexico and California to the United States
Explanation:
The Treaty of Guadalupe-Hidalgo settled the war and gave the USA disputed texan territory, California and New Mexico
The hapsburg empire face a lot of of trouble when trying unifying the empire physically as well as ideologically. This is because of the diverse nature of the people.
Different regions posses;
Habsburg Empire can be regarded as modern umbrella that covers numerous lands as well as kingdoms of the Habsburg dynasty.
Therefore, Habsburg Empire face trouble of uniting people.
learn more about Habsburg Empire at:
brainly.com/question/81734
<span>The Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 was a part of the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984. The Sentencing Reform act removed parole in the federal system, although this didn't affect most of the state criminal justice systems that continued to use parole. It also led to the creation of the US Sentencing Commission. It also led to an increase in the inmate populations in prisons due to longer sentences that offered no option of parole. If this is not managed properly, this creates a very high amount of inmate idleness.</span>
Answer:
I don’t understand this one more info?
Explanation:
Answer:
hope the answers helped you. pls mark as brainliest
Explanation:
In 1831, Alexis de Tocqueville took a 10-month trip to the United States to study the American penal system. In the resulting book—Democracy in America—he singled out one noteworthy feature: “Amongst the novel objects that attracted my attention during my stay in the United States, nothing struck me more forcibly than the general equality of conditions.” Although he ignored the fact of slavery, his reference to economic equality among white Americans was, at the time, accurate. According to economic historians Peter H. Lindert and Jeffrey G. Williamson, the share of national income going to the top one percent was less than 10 percent.Today, the share of national income going to the top one percent has doubled, while median wages have remained largely stagnant. In the last 40 years, CEO wages have grown nearly 100 times the rate of wages for average workers. The popularity of left-wing candidates like Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders—both with significant redistributive policies at the core of their platform—reflects the moral concerns many have about high levels of income inequality.
But no moral case for economic equality will convince those on the Right. What is at stake is an idea of fairness. It is unfair, so the thought goes, for others to live off one’s labor without making an equally productive contribution to society. This appeal to fairness trumps any moral case for income redistribution. There is, however, another case for relative equality of conditions that appeals to the same idea of fairness that’s appealed to by the opponents of redistribution. This view, which has largely been neglected since Tocqueville’s meditations on the subject, argues that a certain degree of economic equality is necessary for fair participation in political life.
